Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

1H24 earnings: A value proposition

Baby Bunting Group
3:27pm
February 20, 2024
BBN reported 1H24 earnings in line with last month’s pre-release. It was a tough half for BBN, with the consumer under pressure and price competition intense. Although it was encouraging to see the trend of lower new customer acquisitions arrested in recent weeks, the 3% LFL sales decline since Boxing Day shows the environment remains challenging (and highly promotional). We’ve made no major changes to our estimates with our FY24 NPAT forecast coming down 2%. We continue to believe BBN will grow earnings in FY25 as its simpler price architecture and greater focus on value start to drive the top line. We retain an Add rating and $2.00 target price.

Ready for the upturn

Reliance Worldwide
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
RWC’s 1H24 result was ahead of expectations with Americas the key standout. Key positives: Americas EBITDA rose 19% in a subdued trading environment; Group EBITDA margin declined by only 10bp despite lower volumes in EMEA and APAC, helped by cost reduction initiatives. Key negative: EMEA external sales in FY24 are now expected to decrease by low double-digit percentage points vs down high single-digits previously. We make minimal changes to FY24-26F underlying EBITDA but increase underlying NPAT by between 9-10% due to lower net interest and tax expense following updated FY24 guidance. Our target price increases to $5.25 (from $4.20) on the back of changes to earnings forecasts and an increase in our PE-valuation multiple to 17x (from 15x previously). Following the strong 1H24 result with momentum from the introduction of new products and cost reduction initiatives, we think RWC is well-placed to benefit when lower interest rate expectations translate into stronger demand.

A bit soft in general

Orora
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
ORA's 1H24 result was below our forecasts but broadly in line with Visible Alpha consensus. Key positives: Group EBIT margin increased 130bp to 8.6% with higher margins in both Australasia (+50bp) and North America (+100bp); Cash conversion (ex-Saverglass) of 92.7% was a big improvement on the pcp (75.2%) due to increased earnings and improved working capital management. Key negatives: ND/EBITDA of 2.6x was above management’s target range of 2-2.5x due to the Saverglass acquisition; ROFE (ex-Saverglass) fell 30bp reflecting increased investment in Australasia. Management has maintained guidance for higher earnings in FY24, excluding the contribution from Saverglass. We decrease FY24-26F underlying EBIT by 3% while underlying NPAT falls by between 7-12% due mainly to higher net interest expense (following updated management guidance), partially offset by lower tax expense. Our PE-based target price remains unchanged at $2.70 with reductions to earnings forecasts offset by a roll-forward of our model to FY25 forecasts. Hold rating maintained.

Hats off to their execution

The A2 Milk Company
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
A2M reported the 1H beat and guidance upgrade we were hoping for. The interest income tailwinds on its large cash balance will see material consensus earnings upgrades. A2M’s execution continued to impress reporting modest growth in a market that fell double digit. Its transition to the new GB standards for its China Label (CL) has gone materially better than most could have imagined 12 months ago. Earnings growth should accelerate in FY25 and FY26. After strong share price appreciation (+33% YTD), we move to a Hold recommendation with a new price target of A$6.05.

Q1 provides hope of NIM stabilisation

Westpac Banking Corp
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
The most interesting element of the Q1 trading update was the moderation in the decline of the Core NIM. Reflecting this contributed to a material upgrade to our earnings forecasts. Cash yield at current prices is 5.7% (fully franked). We lift our 12 month target price by 9% to $23.54/sh. HOLD retained.

1H in-line; higher ASP; unusual kids/channel capacity

Cochlear
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
1H was pre-released, with >10% top and bottom line growth and strong OCF. Cochlear Implants (CI units +14%; sales +22% cc) and Services (+29% cc) drove the result, on strong global demand and solid uptake of the Nucleus 8 (N8) sound processor, while Acoustics was down (-9% cc) on lower overall demand. An “abnormal” ASP increase and “unusual” strength in children supported CI growth, most likely due to COVID catch-up surgeries and better audiology capacity. These likely one-offs, along with slowing CI growth, limited GPM expansion and ongoing elevated opex, portend modest near term operating leverage, in our view. We make no changes to FY24-26 estimates or A$290.45 price target. HOLD.

Investor Day

Macquarie Group
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
MQG’s 2024 investor day lowered outlook expectations for the year, mainly on reduced transaction activity in Macquarie Asset Management (MAM) and Macquarie Capital (MC). The investor day itself focused on MQG’s operations in Asia and Banking and Financial Services (BFS - our key points are below). Broadly we see both these areas as having good growth pathways going forward. We downgrade our MQG FY24F/FY25F EPS by ~-7%/-2% respectively on softer deal flow activity. Our target price is set at ~A$189 with our earnings changes offset by a valuation roll-forward. With upside to our valuation reduced, we move MQG to a HOLD call, with the stock trading at fair value, in our view (-21x FY24F EPS).

Defensive attributes and deeper value

New Hope Group
3:27pm
February 19, 2024
We update for 2Q production and trimmed NEWC price forecasts. We think dividend expectations should be moderated at the 1H Result March 19th. NHC’s defensive attributes – cash margins, balance sheet, steady dividends - appear to have supported a recent premium relative to more leveraged peers. Maintain Hold as NHC trades near to fair value. Our forecast 7-8% yield looks like sound compensation as investors await the next upswing.

Good times roll on, but valuation puts us on hold

Goodman Group
3:27pm
February 18, 2024
GMG continued its upgrade trend, with FY24 EPS growth guidance increasing from +9% to +11%, implying what appears to be a conservative sequential decline of 23% (hoh). The 1H24 result beat VA consensus EPS expectations by 13%, with the standout being the development division, supported by a larger proportion of developments being undertaken on balance sheet (higher margin). The business continues to benefit from the structural demand drivers of the digital economy, namely increased investment in technology and tenant’s need to maximise productivity. This has seen data centre projects rise to 37% of WIP. At $28.5/sh, the stock is trading c.1 standard deviation expensive and at a 12 month forward PER of 27x. For a business growing mid to high double digits, the stock isn’t cheap. Offsetting this is the quality: a portfolio of global assets spanning the most attractive subsectors of the real estate market and a management team capable of delivering EPS growth. Weighing this up, we see GMG as a great business and an essential part of any real estate allocation but too expensive to be a buyer at these prices, despite the earnings upside.

Still trending the right way

QBE Insurance Group
3:27pm
February 18, 2024
QBE’s FY23 NPAT (A$1.36bn) was -2% below consensus (A$1.383bn), with FY24 guidance also slightly softer than expected. While headline numbers were marginally weaker than hoped, fundamentally we saw this as a good FY23 result delivering a 16% ROE, and with a very strong balance sheet (PCA capital ratio of 1.82x versus 1.6x-1.8x target). In our view, the QBE investment thesis still remains very much intact, with the company on track to deliver ~25% EPS growth in FY24, whilst trading on a sub 10x PE multiple. This is too cheap in our view. We lower our QBE FY24F/FY25F EPS by ~-2%-3% on slightly softer GWP and margin assumptions. Our PT rises slightly to A$17.96 (previously A$17.56) with our earnings changes offset by a valuation roll-forward.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more