Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

1Q26 update

Generation Development Group
3:27pm
October 21, 2025
GDG’s 1Q26 business update saw a record Investment Bond sales performance (+A$333m) that beat market expectations. Evidentia SMA AUM growth (+A$3bn) is broadly run-rating in line with FY26 market expectations of +A$12bn growth. Overall, we saw this as a solid enough quarterly performance by GDG, displaying ongoing robust operating momentum. We lift our GDG EPS forecasts by +1%-3% on slight increases to both our Investment Bond sales and Evidentia AUM forecasts. Our price target rises to A$8.01 on our earnings changes and a valuation roll-forward. We think GDG has a great story, and management has executed well over time. With the stock trading at a >10% discount to our price target, we maintain our Accumulate recommendation.

Needing to shift up a gear in the 2H

Bapcor
3:27pm
October 20, 2025
FY26 NPAT guidance of A$51-60m was ~30% below consensus expectations (at mid-point) with a material skew to 2H26 (at mid-point 1H26 A$16m; 2H26 A$40m). BAP expects a significantly improved 2H due to operational improvements lifting the top-line; benefits of its pricing realignment strategy; realisation of cost saving initiatives (A$20m pre-tax benefit); and some qoq improvement within Trade. We had been wary of a more challenging business reset for BAP, but today's update is far weaker than envisaged and our confidence in the meaningful 2H earnings skew is muted. Recent share price weakness (down ~30% since FY25 result) may renew prior corporate appeal (last bid rejected at A$5.40ps in July-24); however, absent a takeover, the stand-alone investment case appears challenging.

Good quarter, Waitsia start-up imminent

Beach Energy
3:27pm
October 20, 2025
A solid 3Q’FY26 result from Beach, posting single-digit beats in production, sales volume and revenue versus Visible Alpha (VA) consensus and MorgansF. Waitsia Stage 2 start-up is imminent, its ramp up performance will be a key catalyst. Undersized reserves remains the key gap in Beach’s otherwise robust fundamentals, leaving a heavy focus on possible M&A. Cooper Basin flood recovery continues in 2Q. We upgrade our rating to HOLD (from TRIM) with an upgraded A$1.25 TP.

High grade, higher torque

Torque Metals
3:27pm
October 20, 2025
We initiate coverage on Torque Metals (ASX.TOR) with a SPECULATIVE BUY rating and price target of A$0.80ps. Drilling beyond the existing 250koz @ 3.1 g/t Au resource has delivered some of the most impressive gram-metre (grade × interval) gold intercepts seen in Western Australia this year, with six holes exceeding 200+ gram-metres. The Paris system remains open, with simple and effective geophysical targeting delivering a high success rate in intercepting high-grade gold. This supports rapid resource growth - we see scope for +500koz Au in the near term (just at Paris main) and a broader 1.0 - 1.5 Moz Au potential across the 57 km mineralised corridor. Upside potential at Paris is supported by several potential commercial avenues: 1) near-term toll treatment and cash flow generation; 2) resource growth supporting a standalone operation; and 3) strategic interest via M&A.

Fleet Network deal

COG Financial Services
3:27pm
October 17, 2025
COG has acquired an additional 14% stake in Fleet Network (a salary Packaging/Novated Leasing business). This deal is expected to be +5% accretive to EPSA. This transaction follows hot on the heels of COG’s recent acquisition of EasiFleet, another Novated Leasing/Salary Packaging business. This shows management’s clear intent to aggressively increase COG’s market share in the Novated Leasing space. We lift our COG FY26F/FY27F EPS by +2%/+5% reflecting the Fleet Network acquisition. Our price target rises to A$2.63 based on our earnings changes, and also a lift to our SOTP valuation multiple, to more in line with peer levels. With >10% upside to our price target, we maintain our Accumulate rating.

Slow pick up, but plenty under the hood

ARB Corporation
3:27pm
October 17, 2025
ARB’s 1Q26 update was slightly softer than expected (1Q26 sales +3.8%; vs 1H26 cons +5.6%), as Export strength (1Q26 +17.6%) offset slower Aftermarket (+1%). Export sales, particularly in the US, continue to strengthen (and appear sustainable), as a slower Aftermarket result was driven by 'fitter' shortages; changing mix of targeted new vehicles; and slower accessorisation rates. ARB is actively addressing these issues, which we expect will improve through FY26. We remain positive on the stock and observe meaningful tailwinds (onshore and off) carrying the group into an improved FY26 result. ACCUMULATE maintained.

Transitional quarter ahead of Barossa

Santos
3:27pm
October 16, 2025
3Q25 production and sales slightly missed expectations, on WA outages and Cooper flood impact and weaker oil-linked LNG pricing. FY25 production guidance trimmed to 89-91mmboe. After the ADNOC fallout, Santos is a bruised name, but this is at odds with core asset reliability and growth delivery visibility, creating an opportunity. Heavily discounted post-ADNOC, valuation risk-reward now skews to the upside. We upgrade to Accumulate (from Trim), with a revised A$6.80 target price.

Solid 2Q26 report; reimbursement decision pending

Aroa Biosurgery
3:27pm
October 16, 2025
ARX has reported a solid 2Q26 cashflow report which is now the fourth consecutive quarter of positive operating cashflow. Importantly the company has reconfirmed its FY26 guidance. We are comfortable sitting at the top end of guidance. The next key catalyst will be the outcome of the proposed changes to the US Medicare reimbursement in relation to skin substitutes, expected in November. If changes are confirmed this could lead to accelerated uptake of SymphonyTM. We have made no changes to forecasts, although after rolling our valuation forward the DCF valuation has increased to A$0.80 (was $0.77). We have moved our recommendation to ACCUMMULATE (from SPECULATIVE BUY) with 13.5% upside to our target price.

Weak 1Q26 does little to dampen cash flow strength

Evolution Mining
3:27pm
October 16, 2025
EVN delivered another solid quarter of cash flow generation despite a weaker quarter of production compared to expectations. Mungari is expected to reach commercial production this month (Oct-25). FY26 guidance reiterated, and EVN has now fully repaid all term debt and gearing is down to 11% (from 15%). Maintain TRIM rating with a A$10.00ps TP (previously A$10.20ps).

We’ve been expecting you

Jumbo Interactive
3:27pm
October 15, 2025
JIN has taken its first step into the international B2C prize draw space, acquiring UK-based Dream Car Giveaways (DCG), a leading digital competition platform, for A$109.9m (~6.5x LTM EBITDA). The acquisition bridges the potential earnings gap from non-TLC revenue streams and accelerates JIN’s strategic shift from slower-growing international B2B operations toward higher-margin B2C opportunities. DCG provides JIN with immediate scale and profitability in a large, underpenetrated UK prize market. While FY26 guidance remains unchanged, DCG is expected to contribute A$14.3-14.9m in underlying EBITDA in FY26, representing 20-25% growth (MorgansF: A$14.4m). After incorporating DCG into our model; adding the recently announced RSL Art Union SaaS contract; and moderating Lottery Retailing growth assumptions, we upgrade JIN to a Buy recommendation and lift our 12-month price target to $15.90 (from $12.90).

News & insights

The US government shutdown that began on 1 October 2025 has deep political roots and significant economic implications. This article explores the Medicaid funding debate, the strategic moves by both parties, and the broader impact on GDP, healthcare, and public sentiment.

Beware the US Shutdown!

Beginning on the 1st of October 2025, the US government began its current Federal government shutdown.
The shutdown occurred because Democratic Party Senators refused to support a Continuing Resolution to provide funding for the US government. At the time of writing, Republican Senators have now put up Continuing Resolutions for funding to the Senate 11 times, and Democrat Senators have refused to support them 11 times.

The more I look at this shutdown, the more it is apparent that Democratic planning for the shutdown really began in July, following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill.

A good start to understanding the Democratic Party’s decisions can be gained by reading a paper published on 22 July by University of California Berkeley Public Health Professor William H. Dow. The paper is titled “What do looming cuts to Medicaid really mean?”

Although the article is about Medicaid, Dow briefly mentions the expiry of subsidies to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare insurance). Dow downplays this as a cause of the shutdown. We cover this issue in an appendix.

Berkeley is particularly interesting because it's in California’s 12th Congressional District. This was one of the long-time districts held by Nancy Pelosi, who resigned as Speaker of the House at the beginning of 2023. So it's really Democratic Party heartland.

In this paper, Professor Dow argued that the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law by Trump on the 4th of July 2025 cuts funding to Medicaid by $100 billion per year. The source document he uses was published by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

When I looked at the source document, it actually says $99 billion per year. Dow rounded it up. We'll draw some analysis from that source document later. For now, we’ll say the cut is $99 billion a year, over the next ten years, continuously.

Medicaid is intended to provide basic health care for the poor. It’s funded by the federal government, but services are provided at the state level. In every state, the agency has a different name. The Congressional Budget Office tells us that in 2023, the total cost of Medicaid was $870 billion.

That means spending on Medicaid is equal to or greater than the GDP of around 170 countries. Only about 20 countries have a larger GDP than the annual US spending on Medicaid.

When we look at that spending, American seniors and disabled people were 21% of enrollees but accounted for 52% of the spending. Children were 37% of enrollees but only 15% of the spending. Professor Dow’s paper shows that Medicaid is important, particularly for understanding the politics around what he calls “Undocumented Immigrants.”

We’ll talk later about Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s discussion of the same group. He calls them “Illegal Aliens.”

This is interesting. I’ve seen polling about the use of these terms. Roughly twice as many Americans use the phrase “illegal aliens” as use “undocumented immigrant”. But “undocumented immigrant” is heavily used in Democratic Party heartland, especially in California, where Professor Dow is based, and in New York State.

Again, Medicaid is intended to provide basic health care for the poor. The program is federally funded but state-administered. Speaker Mike Johnson, speaking on the 1st of October, said that “Medicaid was intended for people in distress, young pregnant women or men who were down on their luck, the destitute and disabled, and the elderly.”

The sources of the savings in Medicaid spending when the bill was passed on the 4th of July came from two areas: identification of recipients as American citizens, and the use of a “work test”.

Republicans tried to reduce benefits to American citizens only. That’s what they’re attempting to do.

Democrats, on the other hand, would like benefits to continue to be extended, officially or unofficially, to illegal aliens or undocumented immigrants.

Let’s talk about “The identification of American citizens”.

This involves people receiving benefits, or the adults in the family, turning up once a year at the state agency and identifying themselves in person. Earlier analysis by DOGE showed a number of invalid claims in Medicaid and other federal benefits.

There were people receiving benefits who had been dead for years, and others who had yet to be born. So Republicans included a condition in the bill that recipients must turn up at the agency once a year and prove they are American citizens.

That would exclude illegal aliens from receiving payments.

There’s also a work test for people receiving medical benefits. If you’re between 19 and 64 years of age and want to receive Medicaid benefits, you must prove you’re working at least 80 hours per month or attending an educational institution for that period.

When the bill became law, it was said these provisions would reduce Medicaid spending by 15%.

Professor Dow based his paper on research from the Kaiser Family Foundation. I examined the same document. It says the reduction is $99 billion a year. As a percentage of the total $870 billion spending, that’s exactly 11.4%, not 15%.

Still, the apparent intent of the Democratic Party is to continue the shutdown until these savings are reversed.

The previous experience of a shutdown was during Trump’s first term. Trump himself shut down a spending bill until it included funding for the border wall. That shutdown lasted 35 days. The result was that Trump’s favourability ratings fell dramatically.

So I think Democrats started this shutdown assuming the same would happen again, that Trump would be blamed, and it would be a political advantage to have a long shutdown.

Unfortunately for them, recent polling by Rasmussen suggests Trump is rating well.

There was a “No Kings” national protest aimed at Trump held on the 18th of October in all 50 states. This shutdown appears to have been planned to coincide with those demonstrations.

This suggests Democrats planned this as a long-term shutdown.

So what could possibly go wrong?

First up, China is using the US shutdown to launch aggressive demands for control of world trade in return for rare earths.

From an economic point of view, a paper published by Standard & Poor’s titled “The rising risk of a prolonged shutdown” is worth noting. The previous longest shutdown was 35 days, or five weeks.

It’s quite possible this one will go longer. The paper calculates that each two weeks of shutdown reduces final quarter GDP by 0.3%. We believe the shutdown will last at least four weeks. That would reduce fourth quarter GDP growth from the current estimate of 2% annualised to 1.4%.

The long-term bond market appears to believe this. In recent weeks, 10-year bond yields have fallen by 10 basis points. I think there’s more to come.

This shutdown may continue for a while. It’s good advice to exercise caution and wait until the shutdown ends. This story still needs time to unfold.

Read more
Investment Watch is a quarterly publication offering insights into equity and economic strategy. This edition explores expected interest rate trends, their impact on asset allocation, and highlights key Australian sectors and tactical opportunities.

Investment Watch is a quarterly publication produced by Morgans that delves into key insights for equity and economic strategy.

This publication covers

Economics - 'A comparative outlook on the Fed and RBA'
Asset Allocation
- 'Countering uncertainty'
Equity Strategy
- 'Broadening our portfolio exposure'
Banks
- 'Price strength compresses potential returns'
Industrials
- 'Wild swings'
Resources and Energy
- 'Sentiment turning'
Technology
- 'Buy quality when opportunities arise'
Consumer Discretionary
- 'Encouraging medium-term signs'
Telco
- 'Defensive attributes remain attractive'
Infrastructure - 'Attractive, but with limited opportunities'
Property
- 'An improving cycle'
Recent Intiations

As we approach Q4, we maintain our positive view on investment markets, grounded in the expectation of slowing but still positive global growth. The shift in market dynamics is driven by the resumption of US Fed rate cuts and the continued acceleration of tech innovation and productivity gains. We think these factors will mitigate the impact of ongoing economic challenges and geopolitical volatility. This quarter, we map the outlook for interest rates and how this shapes our asset allocation decisions. We also provide an outlook for the key sectors of the Australian market and where we see the best tactical opportunities


Morgans clients receive exclusive insights such as access to our latest Investment Watch publication. Contact us today to begin your journey with Morgans.

      
Contact us
      
      
Find an adviser
      
Read more
Michael Knox outlines his expectations for the RBA’s next move, suggesting a final rate cut to 3.35% could occur by year-end—if trimmed mean inflation falls to 2.5% in the October quarterly statement.

Each quarter, the Australian Financial Review conducts a comprehensive survey involving 39 economists who provide forecasts on key indicators such as GDP, the Australian dollar, the cash rate, and core inflation. Over the past two years, the AFR has also ranked these economists based on the statistical accuracy of their predictions. I have been fortunate to be included in the top ten for both years.

In this article, I will share my own views on the economic outlook, as published in the AFR survey, alongside insights from two other top-ten contributors. One represents a major bank and the other a leading financial institution.

Starting with GDP, my forecast for 2025 is 1.7 percent growth. This matches the major bank’s projection. The financial institution is slightly more optimistic, forecasting 1.8 percent. These figures suggest a broadly consistent view of modest growth.

By mid-2026, growth is expected to pick up. I am slightly more conservative than the others, forecasting 1.9 percent for the year to June. For the year to December 2026, I anticipate growth of 2 percent, while the bank and institution forecast 2.2 and 2.3 percent respectively.

This divergence in growth estimates likely reflects differing views on productivity. In the first quarter of this year, most GDP growth came from the public sector, resulting in very low productivity growth of just 0.30 percent. As growth shifts toward the private sector, productivity should improve. However, I expect less private-sector-driven growth, which informs my more cautious forecast. I also anticipate that employment growth will be driven more by Federal government spending and public sector hiring.

Turning to the Australian dollar, I hold a more optimistic view than the other two contributors. I forecast the dollar to reach 68 US cents by the end of this year and 70 US cents by mid-next year. The major bank expects 67 US cents and then 68 US cents, while the institution forecasts 67 US cents and 69 US cents. My outlook on the Australian dollar is based on the belief that Australia’s rate cuts are nearing completion, while the United States is just beginning its rate-cut cycle.

I have previously stated that the Federal Reserve funds rate could fall to 3.35 percent, assuming it stops at neutral. However, if the U.S. economy weakens, which is likely in a midterm election year, the Fed may cut rates more aggressively. Additionally, the inflationary impact of tariffs is expected to fade next year, leading to a significant drop in U.S. inflation by mid-2026. This could prompt the Fed to cut rates below neutral, weakening the U.S. dollar and strengthening the Australian dollar.

Six months ago, I was asked whether it was worth hedging the Australian dollar. At the time, I said no, as I expected more rate cuts in Australia than in the U.S. Now, with Australia’s rate cuts coming to an end and the U.S. just beginning, it is an opportune time to consider hedging the Australian dollar against the U.S. dollar.

Regarding the cash rate, I expect trimmed mean inflation to fall to 2.5 percent in the ABS estimate for the CPI released on 29 October. If this occurs, the Reserve Bank of Australia could cut the cash rate once more to 3.35 percent by year-end. If inflation does not fall, rates are likely to remain unchanged.

Interestingly, the major bank expects rates to fall not only in December but again by June next year. The financial institution sees no cut this year but expects rates to fall to 3.35 percent by mid-next year. Again, Australia is nearing the end of its rate-cut cycle, while the U.S. is just beginning its own rate cut cycle.

On inflation, I believe the RBA can only cut rates if quarterly inflation falls to 2.5 percent. I forecast this inflation number by December and again by mid-next year. The major bank expects core inflation to be 2.6 percent in both periods, which I believe is too high to justify rate cuts. The institution forecasts 2.9 percent inflation by year-end and 2.7 percent by mid-next year, which also seems inconsistent with a rate-cut scenario. These differences highlight varying interpretations of inflation data.

I have previously noted that the RBA places greater emphasis on the quarterly trimmed mean than the monthly CPI. Governor Michelle Bullock confirmed this in her recent media briefing, stating that while the RBA is transitioning to monthly CPI, it will continue to request quarterly trimmed mean data. This is because the quarterly measure provides a more accurate reflection of services inflation. While monthly CPI may be published, the quarterly trimmed mean will remain central to the RBA’s decisions on the cash rate.

Read more