Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Painting a picture of growth

Cleanaway Waste Management
3:27pm
February 18, 2024
1H24 delivered the strong EBIT growth required to contribute to management incentive targets in FY26. However, there were headwinds to EPS and cashflow tracking at the same pace. Our target price lifts 14 cps to $2.54, from forecast upgrades (+4 cps) and valuation roll-forward (+10 cps). HOLD retained. At current prices we estimate a 12 month TSR of -3% and a five year IRR of c.7% pa.

A bit soft at the headline level

Insurance Australia Group
3:27pm
February 18, 2024
IAG’s 1H23 NPAT (A$407m) was down -13% on the pcp, and ~-7% below Visible Alpha consensus. While IAG’s headline result numbers were a bit softer than expected, full year guidance was re-affirmed, and IAG does enter 2H24 with its underlying insurance margin (UIM) seemingly already tracking around 15%. We downgrade IAG FY24F/FY25F EPS by -6%/-2% on slightly softer UIM forecasts and higher interest expense. Our PT is set at A$6.17 (previously A$6.32). We believe IAG is now generally tracking in the right direction operationally after a difficult few years, however, with <10% upside to our valuation we maintain our HOLD call.

When expectations are too high

Inghams
3:27pm
February 16, 2024
ING reported the strongest 1H result in its listed life. However, it was the materially softer than expected volume growth in Australia which disappointed following weakness in the ‘out of home’ channels. Management’s outlook commentary was vague as usual and slightly cautious. However, its commentary around the 1H/2H skew is unchanged. Our EBITDA forecasts are therefore unchanged while NPAT falls slightly due to higher tax. Given expectations were high leading into this result following strong share price performance in recent months, the stock was sold off given there was no beat and outlook commentary was mixed. However, we think the stock has been severely oversold. Trading on an FY25F PE of 11.1x and an attractive dividend yield of 6.1% fully franked, we maintain an Add rating.

Elevated costs impact the half

Aust Securities Exchange
3:27pm
February 16, 2024
Despite revenue growth of 2.4% on pcp to ~A$512m, ASX’s 1H24 result was a miss versus market consensus at NPAT (~A$231m, -8% on pcp and ~6% under consensus) on higher total costs than expected (~A$221m, +27% on pcp). We alter our FY24F-FY26F EPS by ~-2-+2% on higher operating expenses near term with an improved margin profile (cost rationalisation) medium-term. Our price target increases to A$62.70 (from A$60.20). Trading on ~26.5x MorgE FY24F PE, slightly above its 10-year average, we still see the elevated expense profile as weighing on the stock near-term. Hold maintained.

1H24: portfolio re-mixing

HomeCo Daily Needs REIT
3:27pm
February 16, 2024
Portfolio fundamentals remain solid and properties continue to re-weight towards higher growth Daily Needs assets vs Large Format Retail. One acquisition and four divestments to settle in 2H24. LFL income grew 4% which is in line with guidance and the active development pipeline remains on track to complete in 2H24 which will assist in valuation uplifts. Planning on new developments valued at +$530m is underway. NTA $1.44. FY24 guidance reaffirmed comprising FFO of 8.6c and DPS of 8.3c. We retain an Add rating with a price target of $1.37.

Quality rising

GQG Partners
3:27pm
February 16, 2024
GQG reported a strong and in-line FY23 result: mgmt fees +16.8%; operating profit +15.7%; NPAT +18.7%. 2H23 earnings were up 19.7% half on half. Investment performance has been solid/strong across all strategies. This supports flows, which have commenced strongly (US$2.9bn CY to-date vs US$2.2bn pcp). Recent FUM growth provides near-term earnings growth visibility. Starting FUM is +18% on avg FY23; current FUM ~30% above. GQG still has meaningful growth based on the current fund offerings; with the longer-term requiring effective management of the eventual CIO transition and adding new growth avenues to the business. We view the recent re-rate as warranted and valuation still attractive (~11.5x FY24 PE). Add maintained.

The COBRA strikes

Clarity Pharmaceuticals
3:27pm
February 16, 2024
CU6 has released initial findings from its Phase 1/2 diagnostic trial in detection prostate cancer (PC) lesions in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). The results showed the treatment was broadly safe with only one treatment-related adverse event which resolved, and detected significantly more potential lesions than standard of care imaging. The results have given CU6 confidence to push for a Phase 3 trial, although likely requiring a change in design needed to more accurately validate the volume of positive lesions detected over standard of care.

US$5.7bn in 1HFY24 impairments

BHP Group
3:27pm
February 15, 2024
BHP has flagged two large impairments ahead of its upcoming 1H24 result to be released on the 20th February. A US$2.5bn (post-tax) impairment against its Western Australia Nickel carrying-value (Nickel West and West Musgrave) and a US$3.2bn (post-tax) impairment for an increase in the Samarco Dam Failure provision. These impairments will be recognised as exceptional items in the 1H24 result and will not impact BHP’s underlying results, although could still add to BHP’s interim dividend considerations. We maintain our Hold rating with an unchanged Target Price of A$ps.

Growth at any cost?

South32
3:27pm
February 15, 2024
A largely in-line 1H24 result, while the surprise came in the form of updated numbers for the Hermosa Project with S32 reaching FID on the Taylor’s Deposit. 1H24 underlying EBITDA of US$708m (+5%/+2% vs MorgansF/consensus). Despite assuming a zinc price 28% above consensus, S32 still estimates an expected IRR on Hermosa of just 12%. Not leaving much margin for error. We expect S32 will be able to self-fund the Hermosa development out of operating cash flow and debt, although weighing on FCF until FY28. Hermosa looks difficult from a value perspective, but could help S32 gain earnings power. Further expansion through Clark/Peak/Flux could unlock better value. We maintain an Add rating, with a reduced valuation-based 12-month Target Price of A$4.00ps (was A$4.75ps).

Never one to stand still

MAAS Group
3:27pm
February 15, 2024
MGH delivered a good 1H24 result, beating VA consensus expectations and reiterating full year guidance for EBITDA of $190m-$210m. Furthermore, the business announced the acquisition of a further $80m of construction material assets in Victoria and additional industrial land purchases in NSW. So while these assets lay the foundation of future earnings growth, it has seen net debt remain broadly unchanged and gearing at 2.3x Net Debt to EBITDA (excluding leases). With MGH trading on an FY25 PER of 12.6x, the business offers more growth and a lower multiple than many of its peers, with the discount likely attributable to the continued contribution of acquisitions in driving EBITDA growth and the expectation that the business will remain geared at 2-3x EBITDA (excluding leases) over the near term. On this basis, we retain our Add rating, upgrading our target price to $4.35/sh (previously: $4.05/sh).

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more