Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

APG recovery idles as supply volatility persists

GUD Holdings
3:27pm
February 14, 2024
GUD delivered a broadly in-line result, with underlying EBITA (cont. ops), up 11.6% to A$98m (A$87.8m in pcp); and NPATA up 10.5% to A$59.1m (A$53.5m in pcp). The group announced a second bolt-on acquisition for FY24 (~4% of FY23 EBITA in aggregate); delivered strong cash conversion (~93.5%); further deleveraged the balance sheet (~1.7x leverage); and pointed to a robust Automotive outlook. Despite the otherwise solid result, GUD lowered 2H24 APG expectations (guiding to a hoh decline) and introduced increased uncertainty into the group’s ability to realise acquisition business case targets in FY25 (~A$80m). While near-term APG uncertainty will be a focus for the market, we view the core investment case for GUD (entrenched market position; structural industry tailwinds; accretive M&A; offshore organic growth) intact and compelling at ~12x FY25 PE.

Navigating policy setting changes a tricky assignment

IDP Education
3:27pm
February 14, 2024
IEL reported 1H24 adjusted NPAT of A$107m, +23% on the pcp. Result dynamics were in line with expectations: strong student placement (SP) volumes (+33.5%) offsetting weaker IELTs volume (-11.5%). Pricing improvement featured across both IELTs (test fee +7%); and SP (average SP fee +11% on pcp). 1H24 showed positives that will continue to drive long-term growth: fee increases; SP market share gains; and geographic expansion (scaling in USA). However, tightening government policies create a variable near-term outlook. IEL has a strong long-term outlook (five-year horizon) but near-term earnings outcomes have relatively high variability. Potential further policy tightening creates short-term forecast risk: combined with a premium valuation, we maintain a Hold.

1H24 result: A balance sheet with a lot of fire power

Computershare
3:27pm
February 14, 2024
CPU’s 1H24 EPS (US54.8cps) was +23% on the pcp and broadly in line with Visible Alpha consensus (US55.37cps). Overall we saw this as a solid result, with FY24 guidance re-affirmed despite some softer Margin Income (MI) expectations. In our view, the key to the CPU story from here is CPU’s strengthening balance sheet, which provides significant flexibility in the near term. We make relatively nominal changes to our CPU FY24F/FY25F EPS of ~-1%-2%. Our price target rises to A$28.65 (previously A$27.21) on a valuation roll-forward and a lift to our long-term EBIT margin forecasts. ADD maintained.

Softer volume environment triggers downgrade

Seek
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
SEK’s 1H24 result was a miss versus consensus on most key headline metrics. Whilst the downgrade to FY24 guidance was disappointing, and saw the stock trade down ~5% on the day, we note a key driver of the downgrade was the continuation of the seasonally softer volume environment into early 2H24. We lower our FY24F-FY26 EBITDA by ~2-6% on the result and change to guidance. Our DCF-derived valuation is lowered to A$27.30 (from A$27.80) with near term downgrades offset to a degree by less conservatism in our outer year margin assumptions. Add maintained.

1H24 result: Are we there yet?

Vulcan Steel
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
VSL is a cyclical business, which we believe is close to its earnings nadir. As largely expected, the 1H24 result was weak, with revenue slowing further in the final two months of 1H24. However, commentary was incrementally more positive, with sales activity showing early signs of stabilising and increased customer inquiry levels in certain segments throughout Jan/Feb-24. Our investment thesis has never been about FY24 earnings, rather we believe that through the cycle VSL is a low double digit PER business, with the upside really an earnings story in FY25/26/27 – resurgent demand restoring historical volumes and prices. To this end, our thesis centres on buying cyclical companies on high PERs at their earnings nadir, an investment thesis which remains largely unchanged despite our forecast for a weaker than expected 2H24 earnings contribution. Add rating retained, with an A$8.60/sh target price (previously $9.00/sh).

1H24: UHF reaches first close

HealthCo REIT
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
1H24 saw the Healthscope private hospital transaction further bedded down alongside the Unlisted Healthcare Fund which added four institutional investors in addition to HCW ($1.3bn first close with $650m in total equity commitments). The focus now turns to unlocking the development pipeline. Portfolio metrics remain stable (cash collection 100%; occupancy 99%; and WALE +12 years). Asset recycling has been a focus with further asset sales targeted in 2H24. Current gearing 34%. NTA $1.65. FY24 guidance comprising FFO and DPS of 8cps was reaffirmed. Retain Add with a revised $1.61 price target.

1H24 earnings: Tolerate It

BRG Group
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
BRG exceeded market expectations for EBIT in the first half of FY24 and provided guidance for the full year that was within the range of consensus forecasts. So why did the shares fall 8.5%, erasing all their gains from the past two months? It was all about revenue, which came in below expectations, raising questions about the strength of consumer demand. This, we think, is too simplistic. Gross margins were much higher than forecast, which says to us that BRG has not followed its competitors down the path of heavy discounting to stimulate sales. Instead it has sought to manage its business to the delivery of profit and to maintain its customer’s perception of product value. We have trimmed our full year numbers, but really not by much. We think BRG will continue to manage costs and new product development to achieve steady growth in earnings. In isolation, we think the share price reaction was overly negative today, but we still can’t bring ourselves to see current multiples as an appealing entry point. We like BRG for the long-term, but it’s not cheap enough for us for chase it until it’s below $23. For now, Hold.

1H broadly in line; Behring GPM up, Seqirus/Vifor soft

CSL Ltd
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
1H results were broadly in line, with double-digit underlying top and bottom line growth and strong OCF. Divisional sales were mixed, with strong plasma collections propelling Behring sales (+14%), while Seqirus was soft (+2%), but above reduced market immunisation rates, and Vifor headwinds expected to “dampened” near-term growth prospects. Notably, Behring GPM expanded above expectations (+230bp, 50%), owing to a DD decline in cost/litre and numerous other initiatives, with ongoing gains expected to continue supporting the return to pre-COVID margins (c58%) still targeting 3-5 years. FY24 guidance (ccNPATA +13-17%) was reaffirmed, implying a solid 2H (+17% at mid-point), despite Seqirus unfavourable seasonality and lower near-term Vifor growth, with double-digit earnings growth over the medium term also reiterated. Our PT move to A$315.35 on CSL112 removal and modest earnings changes. Add.

Increasing ROE and Accenture partnership impress

Challenger Financial Svcs
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
CGF’s 1H24 normalised NPAT of A$201m was 1% above consensus (A$200m) and +20% on the pcp. Overall, we saw this as a positive result owing to factors including: strong ROE expansion; a solid cost-to-income performance; and the announcement of a value-add IT transformation program. We lift our CGF FY24F/FY25F EPS by 3%-6% reflecting an increase in our life COE margin assumptions, and the cost-out savings from the IT transformation program. Our PT rises to A$7.80. ADD maintained.

Getting in to water-out

Reliance Worldwide
3:27pm
February 13, 2024
RWC has announced the acquisition of Holman Industries in Australia for $160m. We think the deal looks reasonable from both a financial and strategic perspective with Holman marking RWC’s first foray into the ‘water-out’ market, complementing the company’s existing presence in the ‘water-in’ market in Australia. Given management has stated the water-out market is a strategic priority in each of RWC’s three regions (Americas, EMEA, APAC), we think further acquisitions in this space are likely in the future. We increase FY24/25/26F underlying EBITDA by 1%/6%/7% after factoring in the Holman acquisition. We make no changes to existing baseline assumptions. Our target price rises to $4.20 (from $3.56) reflecting a roll-forward of our model to FY25 forecasts. We also increase our PE-based valuation multiple slightly to 15x (from 14x) on an improving medium-term outlook reflecting a stabilisation in the interest rate environment (with the potential for interest rate cuts). RWC is due to report its 1H24 result on 19 February.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more