Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

A few challenges but the core remains strong

Woolworths
3:27pm
January 29, 2024
WOW’s trading update overall was weaker than anticipated. Management has guided to 1H24 group underlying EBIT of between $1,682m-1,699m, which at the mid-point was 2% below our forecast and 1% weaker than Visible Alpha (VA) consensus. While the company said Australian Food and PFD’s performance remained solid, it was a more challenging half for NZ Food and BIG W. We make minimal adjustments to FY24-26F group underlying earnings forecasts (reduction of between 0-1%), with upgrades to Australian Food and Australian B2B slightly more than offset by downgrades to NZ Food and BIG W. Our target price falls to $39.45 (from $39.90) and we maintain our Add rating. Despite the weakness in NZ Food and BIG W, our positive view on WOW remains predicated on a continued solid outlook for the core Australian Food segment.

Simplifying the medication journey

MedAdvisor
3:27pm
January 29, 2024
MedAdviser (MDR) is a medication management, pharmaceutical adherence and patient-pharmacist communication application that aims to simplify the way patients manage their medication. Following a number of transformative acquisitions over the last few years, Factset consensus expects solid revenue growth of 15%/13%/7% over FY24/25/26 respectively and importantly achieving profitability in FY25. MDR posted 1Q24 revenue of A$25.4m, up 27.0% and gross profit of A$15.7m up 30.8% with available funding of A$11.6m to achieve consensus growth of ~11.0% over the next three years.

Books Barossa budget boost

Santos
3:27pm
January 28, 2024
Struggling to contain costs within contingencies following multiple delays, STO increased its development capex budget for Barossa by US$200-$300m to US$4.5-$4.6bn. STO delivered an otherwise in-line 4Q23 result across production and revenue. Capex trailed following delays to Barossa. Net debt stood at US$4.3bn at the end of December. We maintain our Hold rating, viewing STO as having already been rewarded for perceived corporate appeal given current merger talks with peer WDS.

2Q beat; op leverage returns; GLP-1s benefit PAP

ResMed Inc
3:27pm
January 28, 2024
2Q results were above expectations, with double-digit top line and bottom line growth, improving operating leverage and strong cash flow. Devices grew above market (+11%), on strong demand and ex-US could-connected availability, while masks (+9%) tracked expectations, driven by resupply and new patient setups despite softer ex-US (+4% cc on a tough comp +14%). Operating margin expanded 190bp on pcp (first time in 11 quarters) and sequentially (+250bp) on improving gross profit margin and good cost control, with further gains expected. Management presented real-world data from 529k OSA patients prescribed GLP-1s showing an increased likelihood of not only starting PAP therapy, but also improving re-supply rates over time vs OSA patients not prescribed GLP-1s. We adjust FY24-26 forecasts modestly, with our target price rising to $32.82. Add.

No need to rush on green

Fortescue
3:27pm
January 27, 2024
FMG reported a healthy 2Q’FY24 operating performance in its core iron ore segment, while confirming it would not rush its green energy developments. Of some concern, FMG reported a big issue at Iron Bridge’s water pipeline necessitating replacement of a 65km section, to take 18 months. We maintain a Hold rating, viewing FMG as trading near fair value.

Out of the woods

Woodside Energy
3:27pm
January 27, 2024
We upgrade our investment rating on WDS to an Add recommendation, with an upgraded 12-month Target Price of A$34.30ps (was A$33.50). WDS posted a strong finish to the year with a largely in-line 4Q’CY23, although CY24 guidance came in below our estimates/consensus. Importantly subsea work at Scarborough is back underway, with the key offshore project now 55% complete. WDS and STO continue to mutually explore a potential merger. It remains early in the process, but both sides appear motivated.

Time your run

Coronado Global Resources
3:27pm
January 25, 2024
4Q cash flow was again disappointing due to both execution and markets. The reasons driving further sales deferrals – possibly losses – again concern. CRN trades cheaply at (0.87x P/NPV reflecting higher operating risks in recent years and higher balance sheet leverage vs peers. CRN’s appeal for leverage to upside risks in coking coal pricing currently looks challenged by tepid steel markets which pose risks to lower rank met coals around realization and potentially incremental volume in our view.

Pro Medicus Mach 2

Mach7 Technologies
3:27pm
January 25, 2024
M7T has provided a trading update, highlighting an acceleration of trend toward subscription style contracts and away from upfront capital sales. Being paid in installments comes at a near-term cost however, with recognition of these revenues shifting over the life of the contract which is often five years versus the one-and-done upfront sugar hit. A hit this year, but reap the rewards for the next five years. We have long viewed this as a necessary move which will result in a more sustainable and investor friendly business model which more closely resembles that of market darling Pro Medicus. While optically this would appear as a downgrade, the shift supports the valuation over the medium to long term. As a result of our recurring/capital sales weighting changes, our DCF valuation rises marginally to A$1.56ps from A$1.54ps. Add recommendation maintained.

Stretched too thin: Downgrade to Hold

Domino's Pizza
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
We got this one wrong. We thought it possible that Domino’s would snap its streak of missing estimates in 1H24 and deliver a return to growth as sales momentum continued to recover. Domino’s issued a trading update that indicated same store sales have gapped down in Japan, weighing on group earnings and calling into question the strength of the consumer proposition in that market. 1H24 PBT will be $87-90m, below our forecast of $100m and consensus of $103m. We still believe Domino’s will get back to steady same store sales growth and network expansion in time, but it’s taking longer than we expected and the shares are likely to underperform for a while until the company has regained investor confidence. We downgrade from Add to Hold with a $50.00 target price (was $61.00).

System pressures capping near-term upside

IDP Education
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
Canada has announced a two-year cap on new International student visas, expecting to reduce CY24 approvals by ~35% vs CY23. In isolation, earnings impacts from tightening migration and international student policy settings across the major destinations; and visa changes impacting IELTs volumes are manageable. In aggregate, we expect a lower med-term growth profile. The UK election (2HCY24) arguably increases policy risk in the UK. We expect IEL to report a strong 1H24 result, driven by the strength in Student Placement (SP), partially offset with weaker IELTs volume. This composition is arguably weaker, forward looking, given the softening SP growth outlook. IEL continues to offer strong long-term growth. However, we expect uncertainty on announced (and potential) policy change impacts to weigh on the stock. Despite a strong upcoming result, we move to Hold, preferring to have increased confidence in med-term (FY25) earnings at this stage.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more