Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

1H24 earnings: Viva la revolución

Lovisa
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
LOV is democratising jewellery. Its fashionable and attractively priced products are reaching and appealing to a larger and larger global audience. LOV has operations in over 40 markets and substantial white space to expand in almost all of them. The 1H24 result surpassed expectations, mainly due to strong gross margins, which were supported by favourable changes to the price architecture. We have increased our EBIT estimate for the current year by 4%, but, for us, it’s not about the near-term. The investor should focus on what this business could develop into in the years ahead. We reiterate our Add rating and increase our target price from $27.50 to $30.00.

Mixed geographic outcomes

IPH Limited
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
IPH reported slightly below expectations: underlying NPAT +4.5% including acquisitions and currency. LFL revenue +2%; -2% EBITDA. Asia was expected to be weak, however came through weaker than expected at a -6.4% EBITDA. Australia showed some improvement with EBITDA growth of 1% on pcp and 4.5% hoh. Cashflow generation improved which was the highlight. A return of organic growth (which remains very subdued) is the key catalyst for IPH. Some early improvement has been seen in Australia, however Asia is now lagging. There is valuation support near-term and longer-term upside from acquisitions an strategy execution.

1H24 earnings: Best in class; upgrade to Add

Super Retail Group
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
The strength of Super Retail Group’s (SUL) portfolio was apparent in a strong 1H24 result in which sales increased 3% despite cycling strong comps. In our opinion, the business is outperforming the competition across most of its retail operations as it leverages its brand equity, strong omnichannel credentials, well subscribed loyalty programmes and extensive network of stores. PBT was down only (5)% compared, for example, with JB Hi-Fi’s (20)% decline. Although there is some work to do at rebel, in particular, we believe SUL will continue to deliver strong returns and remains likely to declare a special dividend in August. We have increased our earnings estimates slightly in both FY24 and FY25. We upgrade to an Add rating with an unchanged target price of $17.50.

Focus remains on balance sheet/occupancy

Centuria Office REIT
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
Post revaluations at Dec-23, gearing has moved up to ~40% with further asset sales on the agenda. ICR sits at 2.9x vs covenant at 2.0x. FY24 guidance reiterated comprising FFO of 13.8c and DPS of 12c which equates to a distribution yield of ~10% (payout ratio 87%). Although interest rate headwinds appear to be abating, the focus remains on managing the balance sheet via asset sales and maintaining occupancy levels which remain under pressure. We acknowledge the office sector continues to face challenges and expect cap rates will see some further expansion in the near term; however, with COF trading at a +40% discount to NTA on an implied cap rate of ~7.9% (+160bps above Dec-23 book values), we expect this uncertainty is largely being captured into the current security price.

The future looks bright

VEEM
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
VEE’s 1H24 result was comfortably above expectations with EBITDA at the top end of management’s guidance range provided in November. Gyro sales increased to $5m (1H23: $1.7m), Propulsion rose 41%, Defence was up 8% and Hollow Bar grew 38%. Management said the order book remains strong with 2H24 revenue and earnings expected to be similar to 1H24. We lift FY24-26F EBITDA by between 1-6% and underlying NPAT by 7-20% mainly due to lower D&A. Our target price increases to $1.50 (from $1.00) due to changes in earnings forecasts and a roll-forward of our model to FY25 forecasts. Add rating maintained. In our view, the strong 1H24 result shows the business is performing well and we expect the recent deals with Strategic Marine (gyros) and Sharrow Engineering (propellers) will underpin a solid outlook for earnings over the long-term.

Driving sustainable margin outcomes

Eagers Automotive
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
APE delivered FY23 (vs pcp): revenue +15% to A$9.9bn; underlying NPBT +7% to A$433m; DPS +4% to 74cps. The result was in-line with expectations. Cost management was again a highlight, with APE able to absorb a significant step up in funding costs. ROS at 4.4% (-35bps due to acquisitions/mix) is sector leading. Revenue growth guidance of ~A$1bn (+10%) was provided, anchored by ~A$0.8bn from acquisitions. Whilst the order book has declined, it continues to give support to the near-term gross margin outlook. Plenty of med-term structural growth initiatives are in play across: consolidation; strategic industry alliances; leading the EV transition; sales channel optimisation; used vehicles; and new markets (offshore). There will be periods of cyclicality experienced through time, however APE is executing on building a sustainably higher earnings base. Add maintained.

1H24 earnings: On trend

Universal Store Holdings
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
UNI’s focus on offering high quality, fashionable apparel in a well presented store environment with high levels of service is paying off. Despite the challenges facing the consumer discretionary market, especially among the younger demographic, the 1H24 performance was highly resilient. Costs were well controlled and margins outperformed expectations, resulting in EBIT coming in 6% above forecast. The core youth consumer appears to be picking up. We have increased our FY24 EBIT estimate by 4% and reiterate our Add rating with an increased target price of $5.65.

Base in place, building future FUM

HMC Capital
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
HMC delivered a strong 1H result driven by growth in the platform (particularly unlisted/private equity funds which have delivered >20% ROE). FY24 pre-tax EPS guidance was provided which includes performance fees and investment gains. The new detail in the result was focussed around future growth areas which was outlined in tandem with a new divisional structure for HMC given the ongoing growth in the platform via the addition of Energy Transition, Capital Solutions and Digital Infrastructure. Areas under development also include global healthcare and private credit. HMC has also attracted high calibre, experienced people to lead. HMC has been a top performer within the sector with the share price +45% over the past year as the strategy continues to bear fruit. We acknowledge the FUM trajectory towards $20bn is becoming clearer with several new initiatives underway and management to execute. However given recent strong performance we move to a Hold rating post result with a revised PT of $7.25 and note there will be a detailed update on new funds with an investor day to be held in 2H24.

Weak headline result, but underlying trends are ok

MA Financial Group
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
MAF’s FY23 NPAT (~A$42m) was -32% on the pcp and ~-12% below consensus (A$47m). Headline result figures disappointed due mainly to higher costs than consensus. Broadly, the build of MA’s underlying business appears to be going ok. However, a difficult cyclical environment and the higher FY23 investment spend repeating in FY24, means upside here is more an FY25 story, in our view. We lower our MAF FY24F/FY25F EPS by -17%/-21% mainly on higher cost assumptions. Our PT is set at A$6.07 (previously A$6.25) on lower earnings estimates offset by a valuation roll-forward. We still see solid medium term value, and maintain our ADD call.

Aerospace & Defence gaining traction

PWR Holdings Limited
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
PWH’s 1H24 result was comfortably above our expectations with growth in Emerging Technologies the key highlight. Divisional revenue growth: Motorsports (ex-Emerging Tech) +5%, Aftermarket +7%, Emerging Technologies +88%, OEM +12%. Key positives: Aerospace & Defence revenue jumped 124% with a stronger pipeline compared to six months ago; EBITDA margin increased 110bp to 28.6% mainly due to an improved sales mix and increased operating efficiency; Balance sheet remains healthy with net cash (ex-leases) of $15.6m. Key negative: ROE fell 100bp to 26.7%. We make minor adjustments to FY24-26 earnings forecasts with EBITDA increasing by between 1-2% and underlying NPAT also rising by 1-2% Our target price increases to $14.25 (from $11.90) reflecting changes to earnings forecasts and a roll-forward of our model to FY25 forecasts. Add rating maintained. While the stock is not cheap (38.4x FY25F PE), we believe PWH is a high-quality business with a strong track record of growth. With a healthy pipeline of opportunities across all key segments (particularly Aerospace & Defence), we expect this growth trend to continue over the long term.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more
The Wall Street Journal of 21 August 2025 carried an article which noted that Ether, a cryptocurrency long overshadowed by Bitcoin has surged in price in August

The Wall Street  Journal of 21 August 2025 carried an article which noted that Ether, a cryptocurrency long overshadowed by Bitcoin has surged in price in August.

The article noted that unlike Bitcoin, there was not a hard cap on Ether supply, but the digital token is increasingly used for transactions on Ethereum , a platform where developers build and operate applications that can be used to trade, lend and borrow digital currencies.

This is important  because of the passage on 18 July 2025 of the GENIUS act which creates the first regulatory framework for Stablecoins. Stablecoins are US Dollar pegged digital tokens. The Act requires  that  Stablecoins , are to be to be fully  backed by US Treasury Instruments  or other  US dollar assets .

The idea is that if Ethereum becomes part of the infrastructure of Stablecoins , Ether would then benefit from increased activity on the Ethereum platform.

Tokenized money market funds from Blackrock and other institutions already operate on the Ethereum network.

The Wall Street journal  article  goes on to note that activity on the Ethereum platform has already amounted to more than $US1.2  trillion this year ,compared with $960 million to the same period last year.

So today ,we thought it might be a good idea to try and work out what makes Bitcoin and Ether  go up and down.

As Nobel Prize winning economist  Paul Krugman once said "  Economists don't care if a Model works in practice ,as long as it works in theory" .  Our theoretical model might be thought as a "Margin Lending Model" . In such a model variations in Bitcoin are a function of variation in the value of the US stock market .

As the US stock market rises, then the amount of cash at margin available to buy Bitcoin also rises .

The reverse occurs when the US stock market goes down .

Our model of Bitcoin based on this theory is shown in Figure 1  .  We are surprised that this simple model explains 88% of monthly variation  in Bitcoin since the beginning of 2019.

Figure 1 - BTC

At the end of August  our model  told us that when Bitcoin was then valued at $US112,491 , that it was then overvalued by $US15,785 per token.

Modeling Ether is not so simple . Ether is a token but Ethereum is a business.  this makes the price of Either sensitive to variations in conditions in the US Corporate Debt Market.

Taking that into account as well as stock market strength, gives us a model for Ether which is shown in figure 2.


Figure 2- Ethereum


This model explains 70.1% of monthly variation since the beginning of 2019. Our model tells us that at the end of August, Ether at $US 4,378per token was $US 560 above our model estimate of $US3,818.00 . Ether is moderately overvalued.

So neither  Bitcoin nor Ether are cheap right now.

ETFs for each of Bitcoin and Ether are now available from your friendly local stockbroker .

But right now , our models tell us that neither of them is cheap!

Read more