Research Notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Third consecutive result pleasing the market

Woodside Energy
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
Another solid result and positive guidance set by WDS, with a healthy dividend beat an added bonus. We expect the bears to keep moving the ‘goal posts’ until major Louisiana LNG milestones start to land (namely equity selldown(s), which don’t sound far away). We maintain our ADD rating with a net increase in target price to A$30.25 (was A$30.00), with WDS offering compelling medium-term value given an apparent unsustainable discount that has emerged over the last 12 months.

Tracking steadily upwards

Dalrymple Bay Infrastructure
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
DBI produced a largely predictable result, albeit with marginally stronger revenue and better cost management than expected. 1H25 DPS guidance was upgraded. 12 month target price lifted to $4.13. ADD retained. At current prices, 12 month forecast TSR = c.16% and 5 yr IRR = c.10% pa.

Time to turn this thing around

Domino's Pizza
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
With the 1H25 result pre-released earlier this month, there were few surprises on the key numbers. However, new information provided today around franchisee profitability, regional breakdown and 2H25 trading was more negative vs positive. As expected, SSS growth for the first 7 weeks of 2H25 softened vs the first 5 weeks due to the timing of Chinese New Year with both ANZ (still has a tough comp and NZ is weak) and Europe likely remaining sluggish in the 2H. DMP is making positive steps in the right direction with FY26 likely to be a key transition period as it executes on its turnaround strategy to improve unit economics and reignite organic growth. HOLD maintained.

Kiwi Kick to 1H25 result

Solvar
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
SVR’s 1H25 result was ahead of our expectations. Interest income of A$108.6m (decline -3.1% on pcp) was achieved on a gross loan book of ~A$930.4m. Solid underlying 1H25 cost across the group and normalising Bad Debts in NZ as the book continued to wind down, saw the NZ business contribute ~$2.6m to the groups Normalised NPAT of $18.5m during the half (which came in ahead of MorgF $16.9m). Based on SVRs reiterated guidance we make no material changes to our forecasts. Overall, this sees our DCF-based price target modestly increase to $1.55 (prev. $1.45). We retain our Add rating.

Consistent delivery

Tasmea
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
1H25 was strong with growth continuing apace (EBITDA +37% YoY and EBIT +44%). Divisionally, there were the usual swings and roundabouts which highlight TEA’s diversified business strategy. FY25 statutory NPAT guidance was upgraded from $m to $52m, which looked as though it was entirely driven by a $4m one-off tax benefit; however, this now includes the cost of employee incentive plans (approved in November). We make minor adjustments to our forecasts. Based on continued earnings growth, supported by a conservative balance sheet and constructive industry tailwinds, we retain our ADD rating, increasing our 12-month target price to $3.65ps (previously $3.60/sh).

Cost growth outstrips revenue growth

Adrad Holdings
3:27pm
February 25, 2025
AHL’s 1H25 result overall was below expectations with revenue growth more than offset by significantly higher costs. EBITDA for Distribution dropped 20% while Heat Transfer Solutions (HTS) fell 3%. Management expects continued revenue growth in 2H25 but has no longer provided guidance for earnings growth. Previous guidance was for FY25 revenue and earnings to be above FY24 (weighted to 2H25). We decrease FY25-25F EBITDA by between 15-16%. Our target price declines to $0.85 (from $1.10) and we move to a Speculative Buy rating (from Add previously). While we continue to believe the long-term growth prospects for AHL remain solid as the company pursues ongoing opportunities in the aftermarket, mining, power generation and data centre segments in addition to further rationalisation of the manufacturing footprint, earnings may be volatile in the short term due to the project nature of HTS. Some patience is required but trading on 9.0x FY26F PE and 4.3% yield with a healthy balance sheet (1H25 net cash of $18.4m), we think the stock remains an attractive investment opportunity for more risk-tolerant investors. Strong execution from management however remains the key, in our view.

Some signs of life

NIB Holdings
3:27pm
February 24, 2025
NHF’s 1H25 NPAT figure was in line with consensus (A$83m), but the group underlying operating profit ($106m) was 8% ahead of consensus (A$98m). Broadly this was a positive result, with evidence that the company may be through the worst in regards to the recent claims spikes in both its Australian Residential Health Insurance and NZ businesses. We lower our NHF FY25F/FY26F EPS by 4%-7% noting our near-term forecasts were a bit optimistic in certain areas, and we have pulled them back based on the detailed guidance management provided. Our target price is set at A$7.06. We think NHF is a quality franchise, but today’s share price recovery has reduced upside in the name in our view. We move back to a HOLD call.

1H25: Painting a more positive narrative

APA Group
3:27pm
February 24, 2025
The 1H25 result included an earnings/cashflow beat, no change to FY25 EBITDA/DPS guidance, cost-out initiatives, and balance sheet capacity to fund a bullish growth capex outlook (with greater emphasis on gas infrastructure projects). Mild forecast upgrades. 12 month target price lifts 8 cps to $7.21. 8.1% cash yield. HOLD at current prices, with 12 month potential TSR 9% and 5 year IRR 8.6% pa.

P&L stabilised, with trough earnings and multiple

PeopleIn
3:27pm
February 24, 2025
Despite flagging that conditions remain challenging, PPE’s 1H25 result looks to reflect a business stabilising. QoQ normalised EBITDA showed continued trading momentum, with 2Q25 results consistent with 2024 levels. So while billed hours and placement fees declined yoy across most divisions, EBITDA remained relatively stable (-4% vs pcp) as costs declined on the back of recent technology-led efficiency gains. The balance sheet continues to improve with total net debt reducing to $61.9m ($79.3m in Jun-24) as strong cash collections reduced the net debt ratio to 1.7x (2.1x in Jun-24). This cyclical business has suffered in recent years as margin compression saw EPS decline from 20.7cps in 1H23 to 9.7cps in 1H25. However, with EBITDA margins plateauing at 3.5%, we believe FY25 will mark the nadir in earnings, with the business trading on cyclically low earnings and a cyclical low multiple of 8.8x (NTM) EPS. On this basis we upgrade to an Add rating a $1.40/sh price target.

Stable structure – now to build some growth

IRESS
3:27pm
February 24, 2025
IRE reported adjusted EBITDA of A$132.8m, +25% and in-line with expectations. Result composition was mixed, with the core AUS Wealth division down 13% HOH; offset by the UK +49%. Other divisions were relatively stable HOH. FY25 Adjusted EBITDA guidance was provided at A$127-135m (the bottom-end in-line with annualised 2H24 continuing ops performance). Whilst this points to modest growth, IRE is reinvesting cost savings (and higher capex) into revenue growth initiatives. The success of these is key to medium-term (FY26+) growth. IRE’s earnings are more defendable; free cash flow has improved; and the balance sheet strength adds longer-term optionality. In our view, the valuation point implies low growth persists, which provides a strong ‘option’ on management execution.

News & Insights

From Houthi attacks on Suez Canal shipping to Trump’s Operation Rough Rider and Iran’s nuclear facility strikes, explore how these events shape oil prices.

At the beginning of the week, I was asked to write something about Iran. When I started looking at what had been happening , I realised that what we were talking about begins with an action by a proxy of Iran back in November 2023. How  that was initially handled with the Biden regime, and how then it was dealt with  deftly by Trump this year,   in turn led to  the need for an attack on Iran's nuclear facility.

Winston Churchill noted in his first volume of his history of the Second World War that it was important to understand that the United States is primarily a naval power. Indeed, the US remains the world dominant naval power. As such, two major strategic concerns remain for the US : the control of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal .

To the US The idea that another country might block access to either of these must be intolerable. Yet what began happening, beginning on the 19th November 2023, was that , Houthi rebels that controlled a the northern part of a small country in southwestern Arabia, began to act. These Houthi rebels were acting as a proxy for Iran. They were funded by Iran, and armed with Ship-killing rockets, by Iran.

By February 2024, they had attacked 40 ships which had been attempting to sail northwards towards the Suez Canal. By March 2024, 200 ships had been diverted away from the Suez Canal and forced to make the longer and more expensive voyage around the Cape of Good Hope of South Africa. At this point, I think The Economist magazine said that this was the most severe Suez crisis since the 1950s.

The U.S. did respond. On the 18th December 2023, the U.S. had announced an international maritime force to break the Houthi blockade. On the 10th January, the UN National Security Council adopted a resolution demanding a cessation of Houthi attacks on merchant vessels.

As of the 2nd January 2024, the Houthis had already recorded 931 American and British airstrikes against sites in Yemen. Then Trump came to power. To Trump, the idea of the proxy of Iran blockading the Suez Canal could not be tolerated.

From the 15th March 2025, Trump began "Operatation  Rough Rider". This was named for the cavalry commanded by the then-future President Theodore Roosevelt, who charged up San Juan Hill in Cuba during the Spanish-American War of 1898. The U.S. then hit the Houthis with over a thousand airstrikes. So they were bombing at ten times the rate they previously had been. The result of that was that by the 6th March 2025, Trump announced that the Houthis, these proxies of Iran, had capitulated as part of a ceasefire brokered by Oman. This directly led to the main game.

It was obvious that the decision to do the unthinkable, and block the Suez Canal, had come from Iran.
What other unthinkable things was Iran considering?

It is obvious that Trump now believed that the next unthinkable thing that Iran was considering was nuclear weapons. As Iran's other proxies collapsed, Iran's air defence collapsed. In turn, this gave Trump the room to act, and he took it. He launched a bombing raid which severely disabled Iran's nuclear capacity. Some say it completely destroyed it.

Iran retaliated by launching 14 rockets at the American base in Qatar, warning the Americans this was going to happen, and this had no other effect than allowing Iran to announce a glorious victory by themselves over the Americans. Iran had thought the unthinkable and had achieved what was, to them, as a result, an unthinkable reverse.

The ceasefire that has followed has been interpreted by markets as a relief from major risk. Now, the major effect of this on markets has been a dramatic rocketing in the oil price, followed by a fall in the oil price. So I thought I’d look at the fundamentals of the oil price, from running two of my models of the Brent price, using current fundamentals.

Now, the simplest model that I’ve got explains 63% of monthly variation of the Brent oil price. And it’s based on two things. One is the level of stocks in the U.S., which are published every week by the Energy Information Administration .  Those stocks are  down a bit in the most recent months because this is the summer driving season where oil stocks are being drawn down to provide higher demand for gasoline. So that’s a positive thing. And the other thing that I’ve been talking about this year is that I think  we’re going to see a steady fall in the U.S. dollar, and that’s going to generate the beginning of a recovery in commodities prices. So if I also put the U.S. dollar index into this model, it gives me an equilibrium model now of $78.96. And that’s about $US12  higher than the oil price was this morning.

If I strengthen that model by adding the U.S. CPI, because, you know, the cost of production cost of oil raises over time, that increases the power of the model . And that lifts the equilibrium price very considerably to $97 a barrel, which is $30 a barrel higher than it currently is. So I regard that as my medium-term model, and the first one is my short-term model.

What’s really interesting is that the U.S. dollar  has continued to fall.  That puts further upward pressure  on the oil price. So in spite of this crisis having been solved, I think we’re going to see more upward price action on the oil price by the end of the year.

Read more
The US economy is growing strongly at 2.34% in Q2 2025 but is expected to slow to 1.4% in 2025, with falling interest rates and a weaker US dollar likely to boost commodity prices, benefiting Australian markets. Michael Knox discusses.

We think the US economy is currently experiencing solid growth, with data from the Chicago Fed  National Activity Index indicating an annual growth rate of just above  2%. This aligns with projections from other parts of the Federal Reserve System, such as the New York Fed. The New York Fed’s weekly Nowcast, updated every Friday, estimates that for the second quarter of 2025, the US economy is growing at an annualised rate of 2.34%, surpassing the 2% mark. This robust growth is consistent with our model’s view that the US economy is now performing strongly. However, we anticipate a slowdown in the second half of 2025.

On 18 June the Fed released its Summary of Economic Projections  with the Federal Reserve’s  forecasting US GDP growth to drop to 1.4% in 2025, down from their March estimate of 1.7%. Looking further ahead, growth is expected to pick up slightly to 1.6% in 2026 and 1.8% in 2027, aligning with the long-term trend growth rate of around 1.8%. We believe this recovery trend could be even  higher,  driven by reduced regulation under the second Trump administration and aggressive tax write-offs for companies building factories in the US, allowing 100% write-offs for equipment and buildings in the first year. This policy should foster stronger systemic growth.

Economic Projections of the Federal Reserve

The Fed expects that as the economy slows,  unemployment is projected to rise to 4.5% from the current level of 4.2%. Inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is running at 3.5% this year, approximately 50 basis points higher than the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index of 3.0%, with 1.6% of this  inflation  attributed to tariffs. The Fed expects PCE Inflation  to ease to 2.4% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. The Federal Reserve anticipates cutting the effective  federal funds rate, currently at 433 basis points (according to the New York Fed), by 50 basis points by the end of 2025, followed by an additional 25 basis points in each of the next two years. This aligns with our own Fed Funds rate  model’s current equilibrium federal funds rate of  3.85% . The Fed Outlook  supports our scenario of a slowing US economy and rate cuts in the second half of 2025 and beyond. A falling US dollar is then expected to exert upward pressure on commodity prices, benefiting Australian Equity markets.

Taking questions during the Press Conference after releasing the Fed statement  ,Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell,   addressed the certainty and uncertainty surrounding the inflationary effects of tariffs. Initially, at the start of 2025, the inflationary impact of tariff policies was unclear, but three months of favourable inflation data have provided this clarity, indicating that the inflationary effects are less severe than anticipated. Powell noted that the Feds own uncertainty on the inflationary effects of  tariffs  peaked in April 2025, and the Federal Reserve now has a clearer understanding that  the inflation effects, are lower than initially expected.

The Fed view  supports our own scenario of a slowing US economy in the second half of 2025, allowing for Fed rate cuts  . This in turn should then lead to  a falling US dollar, which we in turn  expect to drive rising commodity prices.

Read more
The Your Wealth publication is our half yearly scrutiny into current affairs for wealth management. Our latest Issue 29 is out now.

The second half of 2025 will be an interesting time for everyone. Geopolitical uncertainty prevails. How will all of this impact the Australian investor and in particular, their wealth and retirement savings? Whether you are an accumulator, saving for short- and long-term goals, or a retiree, hoping for a comfortable retirement, the ability to manage this uncertainty will be key.

When we published the previous Your Wealth – First Half 2025, the Division 296 Bill (Div296) was also facing uncertainty. The Bill was eventually blocked in the Senate prior to the Federal Election. The Labor Party succeeded in winning so it’s Ground Hog Day for Div296. The Government doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the Bill without support from other parties. The Greens are the likely negotiating party but will undoubtably have their own agenda. Regardless, there is a high probability this legislation will be passed once Parliament resumes.

Our message to our clients is to wait until we know more details and to not act in haste.

In addition to our Feature Article which provides further insights on Div296, this edition also Spotlights the Aged Care changes due this year, with the start date pushed back to 1 November.

We hope readers enjoy this edition of Your Wealth.


Morgans clients receive exclusive insights such as access to our latest Your Wealth publication. Contact us today to begin your journey with Morgans.

      
Contact us
      
Read more