Research Notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Cooler Runnings

Lindsay Australia
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
LAU’s 1H25 result was much weaker than expected as softer trading conditions and increased competition impacted LAU’s transport segment. Group EBITDA (pre AASB16) of A$47.3m was down -9.2% yoy, -7% lower than MorgF $50.8m. Underlying NPAT also fell -20% yoy to $15.8m also short of MorgF/ Consensus. Management commentary reflects expectations for operating conditions to remain challenging into 2H25. Given this near-term outlook and uncertainty surrounding the recovery in broader conditions we reduce FY25-27F EBITDA by -15%. We move to a Hold rating with a revised target of $0.80ps (from $1.15ps).

1H25 earnings: Upside beyond jackpot cycles

Jumbo Interactive
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
JIN delivered a resilient result despite a weaker jackpotting period in the first half. Looking ahead, JIN will be comping its strongest second half to date, though margins should benefit from effective cost management and incremental upside from Daily Winners. We remain comfortable sitting below consensus for FY26, given uncertainties around draws and recovery in Managed Services. Despite this, we see limited downside (<10x FY25-26F EV/EBITDA), supported by a strong net cash position. We see upside to guided Managed Services margins, driven by contract mix and FX benefits. We maintain our Add recommendation, with our PT reduced to $13.60 (previously $14.60).

Lets taco’bout those comps

Guzman y Gomez
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
Whilst GYG’s 1H25 result didn’t deliver a much anticipated beat and consensus earnings upgrade, it was nonetheless a strong half of execution and growth. Importantly, comp sales growth continues to accelerate into the 2H25 and GYG now expects to exceed its prospectus forecasts (consensus was already above). Following share price weakness, we upgrade to ADD.

Better than feared

Inghams
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
As we expected, ING reported a weak 1H25 result given it was comping a record pcp. However, importantly the result was in line with our forecast and was better than feared. The 1H25 was impacted by weakness in out-of-home channels due to cost-of-living pressures. FY25 guidance was maintained which implies that solid earnings growth will resume in the 2H25. However, uncertainty remains over FY26 earnings given the WOW contract hasn’t been fully replaced, albeit ING has made solid progress. Given FY26 is likely a transition year, the stock is lacking share price catalysts and with less than 10% upside to our price target, we move to a Hold rating. We expect that ING’s attractive fully franked dividend yield will provide share price support.

Gearing up for more

AMA Group
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
AMA delivered an improved 1H25 result, reporting sales +5% to A$472.4m; gross profit +8% to A$266.5m; and normalised EBITDA +17% to A$25.7m. Outperformance within Capital SMART (EBITDA +A$4.8m vs pcp) and Wales (+A$2.1m) drove the result as Collision continues to recover slowly (-A$3.5m). Importantly, AMA is seeing some momentum in Collision and expects the continued strength of SMART/Wales will ensure FY25 guidance is achieved (EBITDA A$m+). We expect patience will be required through the recovery of Collision but see significant value should the business meet its medium-term targets. Add.

Mobile and cost controls continue to deliver

Telstra Group
3:27pm
February 23, 2025
TLS’s 1H25 result and FY25 guidance were largely as expected. Tight cost control was the main driver of underlying EBITDA growth in the half. The dividend lifted 5.6% to 9.5cps and given relatively low debt, and the Board approved an on-market share buy-back of up to A$750m. We retain our reduce recommendation and set our Target Price at $3.45 p/s.

Moving faster on Sharrow

VEEM
3:27pm
February 22, 2025
VEE’s 1H25 result was largely in line with our expectations and management’s guidance provided in December. Sales for Propulsion (-10%), Gyros (-35%), and Defence (-24%) declined while Engineering Products & Services sales were higher (+22%). VEE and Sharrow have agreed on a plan to accelerate the design of ‘Sharrow by VEEM’ propellers whereby Sharrow will directly manage all communications, data gathering, and sales efforts over the next 12 months while VEE will focus on manufacturing and engineering support. We make no changes to FY25 earnings forecasts but decrease FY26-27F EBITDA by 6-15% mainly on reduced sales and margin assumptions for ‘Sharrow by VEEM’ propellers. Our target price falls to $1.50 (from $1.55 previously) following the updates to earnings forecasts and a roll-forward of our model to FY26 estimates. While FY25 will be a consolidation year for VEE after strong growth in FY24, we continue to believe in the long-term growth prospects in propellers (US$2.7bn addressable market), gyros (US$14.6bn) and defence (an industry VEE has supplied to since 1988). We hence maintain our Add rating.

1H25 result: Marked down

Accent Group
3:27pm
February 22, 2025
AX1’s first half result was in line with guidance, EBIT was up 11.6%, although this was assisted by the reversal of a historical impairment. A highly promotional environment put pressure on gross margins, which was somewhat offset by good cost management. We have revised our forecasts taking EBIT down by 3% and 5% respectively in FY25/26. We have moved to a HOLD recommendation based on ongoing uncertainty in the trading environment, increased pressure of margins in the short term, and slower rollout estimates. Our target price reduces to $2.20 from $2.40.

It’s all about timing

PWR Holdings Limited
3:27pm
February 22, 2025
PWH’s 1H25 result overall was largely in line with management’s guidance provided in November. FY25 expectations for revenue growth however were weaker than anticipated. Management has flagged the potential for disruptions related to the move to the new Australian facility commencing in April. As a result, FY25 revenue is expected to be 5-10% below FY24. We were previously forecasting 3% growth. We reduce NPAT by 45% in FY25F while FY26-27F declines by 9-12%. While the majority of the disruption will be in FY25, some flow-through is possible in early FY26 given the completion of the move is not expected until November 2025. Our target price decreases to $8.80 (from $9.20) following changes to earnings forecasts and a roll-forward of our model to FY26 estimates. While FY25 will see lower revenue and higher costs as PWH transitions to its new facility in Australia, we expect increased production efficiencies and streamlined workflows to start benefitting margins from FY26 onwards. Management has a track record of investing ahead of revenue growth and we view the expansion in capacity and people as a strong endorsement on the pipeline of opportunities ahead. Some patience will be required but we think the long-term investment thesis remains intact. Add rating maintained.

Showing continued momentum

QBE Insurance Group
3:27pm
February 22, 2025
QBE’s FY24 NPAT (A$1.79bn) was 4% above Factset consensus (A$1.71bn) and +31% on the pcp.  Overall we saw this as a solid and clean result, punctuated by QBE delivering further underwriting improvement in FY24. We upgrade our QBE FY25F/FY26F EPS by 2%-7% on improved top-line growth and margin assumptions. Our PT increases to A$23.79 (previously A$21.74). Whilst QBE has re-rated in line with our investment thesis, it still trades on only ~11.5x earnings, which is a significant discount to peers SUN and IAG (~20x). We maintain our ADD recommendation with >10% TSR upside.

News & Insights

From Houthi attacks on Suez Canal shipping to Trump’s Operation Rough Rider and Iran’s nuclear facility strikes, explore how these events shape oil prices.

At the beginning of the week, I was asked to write something about Iran. When I started looking at what had been happening , I realised that what we were talking about begins with an action by a proxy of Iran back in November 2023. How  that was initially handled with the Biden regime, and how then it was dealt with  deftly by Trump this year,   in turn led to  the need for an attack on Iran's nuclear facility.

Winston Churchill noted in his first volume of his history of the Second World War that it was important to understand that the United States is primarily a naval power. Indeed, the US remains the world dominant naval power. As such, two major strategic concerns remain for the US : the control of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal .

To the US The idea that another country might block access to either of these must be intolerable. Yet what began happening, beginning on the 19th November 2023, was that , Houthi rebels that controlled a the northern part of a small country in southwestern Arabia, began to act. These Houthi rebels were acting as a proxy for Iran. They were funded by Iran, and armed with Ship-killing rockets, by Iran.

By February 2024, they had attacked 40 ships which had been attempting to sail northwards towards the Suez Canal. By March 2024, 200 ships had been diverted away from the Suez Canal and forced to make the longer and more expensive voyage around the Cape of Good Hope of South Africa. At this point, I think The Economist magazine said that this was the most severe Suez crisis since the 1950s.

The U.S. did respond. On the 18th December 2023, the U.S. had announced an international maritime force to break the Houthi blockade. On the 10th January, the UN National Security Council adopted a resolution demanding a cessation of Houthi attacks on merchant vessels.

As of the 2nd January 2024, the Houthis had already recorded 931 American and British airstrikes against sites in Yemen. Then Trump came to power. To Trump, the idea of the proxy of Iran blockading the Suez Canal could not be tolerated.

From the 15th March 2025, Trump began "Operatation  Rough Rider". This was named for the cavalry commanded by the then-future President Theodore Roosevelt, who charged up San Juan Hill in Cuba during the Spanish-American War of 1898. The U.S. then hit the Houthis with over a thousand airstrikes. So they were bombing at ten times the rate they previously had been. The result of that was that by the 6th March 2025, Trump announced that the Houthis, these proxies of Iran, had capitulated as part of a ceasefire brokered by Oman. This directly led to the main game.

It was obvious that the decision to do the unthinkable, and block the Suez Canal, had come from Iran.
What other unthinkable things was Iran considering?

It is obvious that Trump now believed that the next unthinkable thing that Iran was considering was nuclear weapons. As Iran's other proxies collapsed, Iran's air defence collapsed. In turn, this gave Trump the room to act, and he took it. He launched a bombing raid which severely disabled Iran's nuclear capacity. Some say it completely destroyed it.

Iran retaliated by launching 14 rockets at the American base in Qatar, warning the Americans this was going to happen, and this had no other effect than allowing Iran to announce a glorious victory by themselves over the Americans. Iran had thought the unthinkable and had achieved what was, to them, as a result, an unthinkable reverse.

The ceasefire that has followed has been interpreted by markets as a relief from major risk. Now, the major effect of this on markets has been a dramatic rocketing in the oil price, followed by a fall in the oil price. So I thought I’d look at the fundamentals of the oil price, from running two of my models of the Brent price, using current fundamentals.

Now, the simplest model that I’ve got explains 63% of monthly variation of the Brent oil price. And it’s based on two things. One is the level of stocks in the U.S., which are published every week by the Energy Information Administration .  Those stocks are  down a bit in the most recent months because this is the summer driving season where oil stocks are being drawn down to provide higher demand for gasoline. So that’s a positive thing. And the other thing that I’ve been talking about this year is that I think  we’re going to see a steady fall in the U.S. dollar, and that’s going to generate the beginning of a recovery in commodities prices. So if I also put the U.S. dollar index into this model, it gives me an equilibrium model now of $78.96. And that’s about $US12  higher than the oil price was this morning.

If I strengthen that model by adding the U.S. CPI, because, you know, the cost of production cost of oil raises over time, that increases the power of the model . And that lifts the equilibrium price very considerably to $97 a barrel, which is $30 a barrel higher than it currently is. So I regard that as my medium-term model, and the first one is my short-term model.

What’s really interesting is that the U.S. dollar  has continued to fall.  That puts further upward pressure  on the oil price. So in spite of this crisis having been solved, I think we’re going to see more upward price action on the oil price by the end of the year.

Read more
The US economy is growing strongly at 2.34% in Q2 2025 but is expected to slow to 1.4% in 2025, with falling interest rates and a weaker US dollar likely to boost commodity prices, benefiting Australian markets. Michael Knox discusses.

We think the US economy is currently experiencing solid growth, with data from the Chicago Fed  National Activity Index indicating an annual growth rate of just above  2%. This aligns with projections from other parts of the Federal Reserve System, such as the New York Fed. The New York Fed’s weekly Nowcast, updated every Friday, estimates that for the second quarter of 2025, the US economy is growing at an annualised rate of 2.34%, surpassing the 2% mark. This robust growth is consistent with our model’s view that the US economy is now performing strongly. However, we anticipate a slowdown in the second half of 2025.

On 18 June the Fed released its Summary of Economic Projections  with the Federal Reserve’s  forecasting US GDP growth to drop to 1.4% in 2025, down from their March estimate of 1.7%. Looking further ahead, growth is expected to pick up slightly to 1.6% in 2026 and 1.8% in 2027, aligning with the long-term trend growth rate of around 1.8%. We believe this recovery trend could be even  higher,  driven by reduced regulation under the second Trump administration and aggressive tax write-offs for companies building factories in the US, allowing 100% write-offs for equipment and buildings in the first year. This policy should foster stronger systemic growth.

Economic Projections of the Federal Reserve

The Fed expects that as the economy slows,  unemployment is projected to rise to 4.5% from the current level of 4.2%. Inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is running at 3.5% this year, approximately 50 basis points higher than the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index of 3.0%, with 1.6% of this  inflation  attributed to tariffs. The Fed expects PCE Inflation  to ease to 2.4% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. The Federal Reserve anticipates cutting the effective  federal funds rate, currently at 433 basis points (according to the New York Fed), by 50 basis points by the end of 2025, followed by an additional 25 basis points in each of the next two years. This aligns with our own Fed Funds rate  model’s current equilibrium federal funds rate of  3.85% . The Fed Outlook  supports our scenario of a slowing US economy and rate cuts in the second half of 2025 and beyond. A falling US dollar is then expected to exert upward pressure on commodity prices, benefiting Australian Equity markets.

Taking questions during the Press Conference after releasing the Fed statement  ,Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell,   addressed the certainty and uncertainty surrounding the inflationary effects of tariffs. Initially, at the start of 2025, the inflationary impact of tariff policies was unclear, but three months of favourable inflation data have provided this clarity, indicating that the inflationary effects are less severe than anticipated. Powell noted that the Feds own uncertainty on the inflationary effects of  tariffs  peaked in April 2025, and the Federal Reserve now has a clearer understanding that  the inflation effects, are lower than initially expected.

The Fed view  supports our own scenario of a slowing US economy in the second half of 2025, allowing for Fed rate cuts  . This in turn should then lead to  a falling US dollar, which we in turn  expect to drive rising commodity prices.

Read more
The Your Wealth publication is our half yearly scrutiny into current affairs for wealth management. Our latest Issue 29 is out now.

The second half of 2025 will be an interesting time for everyone. Geopolitical uncertainty prevails. How will all of this impact the Australian investor and in particular, their wealth and retirement savings? Whether you are an accumulator, saving for short- and long-term goals, or a retiree, hoping for a comfortable retirement, the ability to manage this uncertainty will be key.

When we published the previous Your Wealth – First Half 2025, the Division 296 Bill (Div296) was also facing uncertainty. The Bill was eventually blocked in the Senate prior to the Federal Election. The Labor Party succeeded in winning so it’s Ground Hog Day for Div296. The Government doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the Bill without support from other parties. The Greens are the likely negotiating party but will undoubtably have their own agenda. Regardless, there is a high probability this legislation will be passed once Parliament resumes.

Our message to our clients is to wait until we know more details and to not act in haste.

In addition to our Feature Article which provides further insights on Div296, this edition also Spotlights the Aged Care changes due this year, with the start date pushed back to 1 November.

We hope readers enjoy this edition of Your Wealth.


Morgans clients receive exclusive insights such as access to our latest Your Wealth publication. Contact us today to begin your journey with Morgans.

      
Contact us
      
Read more