Research Notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Prior price support softening

New Hope Group
3:27pm
February 17, 2025
2Q underlying EBITDA beat our forecasts slightly due mainly to lower costs. No changes to FY25 guidance offers comfort amid a falling price environment, particularly given NHC’s cost/ margin advantages versus direct peers. NHC’s defensive attributes – cash margins, balance sheet, steady dividends – has supported outperformance versus peers, but very sluggish NEWC pricing dynamics does now challenge the prior price floor. NHC looks too cheap and remains an Add but lacks a near-term catalyst.

On the acquisition trail

Intelligent Monitoring Group
3:27pm
February 17, 2025
IMB announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Kobe Pty Ltd for 3.5x EBITDA (2.8x upfront consideration). This is consistent with the acquisition strategy detailed in November when IMB raised $20m to acquire DVL and confirmed that it had commenced discussions to acquire a further five businesses. We have taken the opportunity to fine-tune our interest costs for FY25. While we had originally forecasted some interest cost savings in FY25 due to the re-financing, these will be offset by some amortisation costs (original fees and warranties) which means net interest in FY25 is expected to be largely the same as FY24. Following these adjustments, our target price rises from 70cps to 75cps. We now forecast EPS growth of +10% in FY25 and +63% in FY26. The stock is trading on <6x FY26 PE, which is too cheap given the growth outlook, cash generation potential and balance sheet capacity. IMB has received full documentation for a new debt facility with NAB. This will provide an additional $37.5m of debt capacity (new facility is $122.5m vs existing $80m) at half the interest rate (new facility ~7% vs existing 15%). The interest rate was at the lower end of our expectations for 7-8% and will result in a material reduction in interest expense (>$6.5mpa). Implementation is expected by the end of March. The reduction in interest expense (>$6.5m) adds at least 1.9cps of EPSA which is +36% vs FY24 (5.3cps). We have taken the opportunity to fine-tune our interest costs for FY25. While we had originally forecasted some interest cost savings in FY25 due to the re-financing, these will be offset by some amortisation costs (original fees and warranties) which means net interest in FY25 is expected to be largely the same as FY24 (~$16m). From FY26, the savings will take full effect and interest costs will halve to just ~$8m.

Improving cash receipts although cash is tight

Control Bionics
3:27pm
February 17, 2025
CBL posted 2Q25 cashflow report noting customer receipts of A$1.4m (up 30% on pcp) and operating cash outflow of A$1.7m. CBL finished the quarter with a cash balance of A$1.0m. During the quarter the company completed a A$2.3m capital raising. Management expect the cash flow in subsequent quarters to improve reflecting cost reductions, stronger US sales and improved NDIS approvals. We are continually reviewing our Healthcare coverage list. At this time we will remove CBL from our Keeping Stock coverage.

Model update

Orora
3:27pm
February 16, 2025
We found an error in our model which resulted in an incorrect calculation of our net interest expense and tax estimates for FY26 and FY27. Our FY25 forecasts were unaffected. After updating our net interest expense and tax estimates, underlying NPAT in FY25F remains unchanged while FY26F rises by 8% and FY27F increases by 7%. We make no changes to other assumptions (ie revenue, EBITDA and EBIT). Our PE-based target price increases to $2.32 (from $2.15) on the back of the updates to earnings forecasts. In our view, ORA is a solid, defensive business with good global market positions in beverages and a strong balance sheet that provides capacity for further organic growth investments. We see potential upside from increased takeover interest in the company and downside if our assumptions of a recovery in FY26 earnings fail to materialise. On balance, we think the current share price broadly reflects the range of possible outcomes and maintain our Hold rating. Upside risks include better-than-expected revenue growth, margins and cost synergies from the Saverglass acquisition as well as a takeover offer for the company. Downside risks include weaker-than-expected global economic growth, higher raw materials and energy prices, and Saverglass earnings, integration and cost synergy targets not being met.

Not alone, but disappointing

GrainCorp
3:27pm
February 16, 2025
GNC’s FY25 earnings guidance was well below consensus. The bigger issue was that despite benefiting from the 4th largest east coast grain crop on record, the mid-point of guidance was well below GNC’s ‘through-the-cycle’ EBITDA guidance. GNC is being impacted by below average grain trading and crush margins. While the seasonal outlook for FY26 appears somewhat favourable over coming months, there is a long way to go until this crop will be harvest. We maintain a Hold rating with a new price target of A$8.04.

More project delays

Civmec
3:27pm
February 16, 2025
The 1H result was disappointing, not least due to a soft 2Q where both revenue and margins faded materially QoQ, but also because of more negative outlook commentary. Although management had already provided that lower levels of activity should be expected in 3Q and potentially into 4Q, a “shift in market conditions” may now see this extend into 2H26. This has culminated in a sharp decline in the order book to just $633m from $1bn in the pcp and $800m at 1Q. An energy project was the main issue; however, iron ore work, which is CVL’s main battleground, is also seeing delays. While CVL is a high-quality contracting business, outside of a large naval shipbuilding award (Landing Craft Heavy), for which the timing is uncertain, our view is that there’s a lack of near-term catalysts to propel the share price higher. We cut our FY25 EPS forecast by nearly 20%, which sees our target price decline to $1.10 (from A$1.40). Move to Hold.

1H mixed - Hearing improvement needed in Services

Cochlear
3:27pm
February 16, 2025
1H results were mixed and quality poor, with net profit in line, but on softer than expected sales as underlying margins were supported by other income. Cochlear Implants (CI) slowed on soft Emerging Market (EM) tenders offsetting Development Market (DM) growth, although favourable product mix supported sales, while Services went backwards on waning Nucleus 8 (N8) sound processor upgrades and US “cost of living” pressures, and Acoustics surprised to the upside. While FY25 guidance is targeting the lower end of the range, we see risk in Services reigniting growth in front of a mid-cycle launch and inflationary headwinds, ongoing uncertainties around CI audiological capacity, and increasing margin headwinds on higher IT spend, limiting operating leverage and strong profitable growth. FY25-27 net profit falls up to 5.9%, with our target price falling to A$285.55. HOLD.

Adding value to the mix

GQG Partners
3:27pm
February 14, 2025
GQQ reported revenue +% and NPAT +53% on pcp to US$431.6m. The result slightly beat expectations across the board, with operating profit delivering ~11% HOH growth to US$303.7m. The flows outlook remains solid at the group level, with acceleration of inflows in the wholesale channel looking set to continue. Recent investment underperformance in the EM strategy could see some outflow risk in the strategy. The dividend payout policy range has changed to 50-95%. The group stated there is no current intention to vary the payout, however this allows the flexibility to build capital for strategic opportunities if required. GQG still has meaningful growth based on the current fund offerings; with longer-term optionality from leveraging the distribution capability (PCS; additional teams). We view the valuation as attractive at ~10x FY25 PE. Add maintained.

Model update and 1H25 result

Northern Star Resources
3:27pm
February 14, 2025
1H25 earnings were solid, driven by a strong gold price with underlying EBITDA exceeding expectations by 3%. 804koz of gold was sold at an average realised price of A$3,562/oz, with an AISC of A$2,105/oz. Balance sheet is strong, with A$265m in net cash and a record interim dividend of A$0.25 per share beating Morgans' forecast of A$0.21 per share. We have updated our model to incorporate changes in spot gold price (US$2,850, previously US$2,600).

Luxury lead growth strategy delivers

Treasury Wine Estates
3:27pm
February 13, 2025
TWE’s 1H25 result was strong, albeit it was cycling a weak pcp and Penfolds benefited from China’s reopening and Treasury Americas (TA) from the acquisition of DAOU. Pleasingly, its two Luxury portfolios grew strongly while its much smaller and low margin Treasury Premium Brands (TPB) continues to disappoint. FY25 EBITS guidance was revised by 1.9% at the mid-point due to TPB’s underperformance. DAOU’s synergy target was materially upgraded. TWE’s targets for both of its Luxury wine businesses over the next few years, if delivered, will underpin double digit earnings growth out to FY27. While not without risk given industry and macro headwinds, TWE’s trading multiples look particularly attractive to us and we maintain an Add rating.

News & Insights

From Houthi attacks on Suez Canal shipping to Trump’s Operation Rough Rider and Iran’s nuclear facility strikes, explore how these events shape oil prices.

At the beginning of the week, I was asked to write something about Iran. When I started looking at what had been happening , I realised that what we were talking about begins with an action by a proxy of Iran back in November 2023. How  that was initially handled with the Biden regime, and how then it was dealt with  deftly by Trump this year,   in turn led to  the need for an attack on Iran's nuclear facility.

Winston Churchill noted in his first volume of his history of the Second World War that it was important to understand that the United States is primarily a naval power. Indeed, the US remains the world dominant naval power. As such, two major strategic concerns remain for the US : the control of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal .

To the US The idea that another country might block access to either of these must be intolerable. Yet what began happening, beginning on the 19th November 2023, was that , Houthi rebels that controlled a the northern part of a small country in southwestern Arabia, began to act. These Houthi rebels were acting as a proxy for Iran. They were funded by Iran, and armed with Ship-killing rockets, by Iran.

By February 2024, they had attacked 40 ships which had been attempting to sail northwards towards the Suez Canal. By March 2024, 200 ships had been diverted away from the Suez Canal and forced to make the longer and more expensive voyage around the Cape of Good Hope of South Africa. At this point, I think The Economist magazine said that this was the most severe Suez crisis since the 1950s.

The U.S. did respond. On the 18th December 2023, the U.S. had announced an international maritime force to break the Houthi blockade. On the 10th January, the UN National Security Council adopted a resolution demanding a cessation of Houthi attacks on merchant vessels.

As of the 2nd January 2024, the Houthis had already recorded 931 American and British airstrikes against sites in Yemen. Then Trump came to power. To Trump, the idea of the proxy of Iran blockading the Suez Canal could not be tolerated.

From the 15th March 2025, Trump began "Operatation  Rough Rider". This was named for the cavalry commanded by the then-future President Theodore Roosevelt, who charged up San Juan Hill in Cuba during the Spanish-American War of 1898. The U.S. then hit the Houthis with over a thousand airstrikes. So they were bombing at ten times the rate they previously had been. The result of that was that by the 6th March 2025, Trump announced that the Houthis, these proxies of Iran, had capitulated as part of a ceasefire brokered by Oman. This directly led to the main game.

It was obvious that the decision to do the unthinkable, and block the Suez Canal, had come from Iran.
What other unthinkable things was Iran considering?

It is obvious that Trump now believed that the next unthinkable thing that Iran was considering was nuclear weapons. As Iran's other proxies collapsed, Iran's air defence collapsed. In turn, this gave Trump the room to act, and he took it. He launched a bombing raid which severely disabled Iran's nuclear capacity. Some say it completely destroyed it.

Iran retaliated by launching 14 rockets at the American base in Qatar, warning the Americans this was going to happen, and this had no other effect than allowing Iran to announce a glorious victory by themselves over the Americans. Iran had thought the unthinkable and had achieved what was, to them, as a result, an unthinkable reverse.

The ceasefire that has followed has been interpreted by markets as a relief from major risk. Now, the major effect of this on markets has been a dramatic rocketing in the oil price, followed by a fall in the oil price. So I thought I’d look at the fundamentals of the oil price, from running two of my models of the Brent price, using current fundamentals.

Now, the simplest model that I’ve got explains 63% of monthly variation of the Brent oil price. And it’s based on two things. One is the level of stocks in the U.S., which are published every week by the Energy Information Administration .  Those stocks are  down a bit in the most recent months because this is the summer driving season where oil stocks are being drawn down to provide higher demand for gasoline. So that’s a positive thing. And the other thing that I’ve been talking about this year is that I think  we’re going to see a steady fall in the U.S. dollar, and that’s going to generate the beginning of a recovery in commodities prices. So if I also put the U.S. dollar index into this model, it gives me an equilibrium model now of $78.96. And that’s about $US12  higher than the oil price was this morning.

If I strengthen that model by adding the U.S. CPI, because, you know, the cost of production cost of oil raises over time, that increases the power of the model . And that lifts the equilibrium price very considerably to $97 a barrel, which is $30 a barrel higher than it currently is. So I regard that as my medium-term model, and the first one is my short-term model.

What’s really interesting is that the U.S. dollar  has continued to fall.  That puts further upward pressure  on the oil price. So in spite of this crisis having been solved, I think we’re going to see more upward price action on the oil price by the end of the year.

Read more
The US economy is growing strongly at 2.34% in Q2 2025 but is expected to slow to 1.4% in 2025, with falling interest rates and a weaker US dollar likely to boost commodity prices, benefiting Australian markets. Michael Knox discusses.

We think the US economy is currently experiencing solid growth, with data from the Chicago Fed  National Activity Index indicating an annual growth rate of just above  2%. This aligns with projections from other parts of the Federal Reserve System, such as the New York Fed. The New York Fed’s weekly Nowcast, updated every Friday, estimates that for the second quarter of 2025, the US economy is growing at an annualised rate of 2.34%, surpassing the 2% mark. This robust growth is consistent with our model’s view that the US economy is now performing strongly. However, we anticipate a slowdown in the second half of 2025.

On 18 June the Fed released its Summary of Economic Projections  with the Federal Reserve’s  forecasting US GDP growth to drop to 1.4% in 2025, down from their March estimate of 1.7%. Looking further ahead, growth is expected to pick up slightly to 1.6% in 2026 and 1.8% in 2027, aligning with the long-term trend growth rate of around 1.8%. We believe this recovery trend could be even  higher,  driven by reduced regulation under the second Trump administration and aggressive tax write-offs for companies building factories in the US, allowing 100% write-offs for equipment and buildings in the first year. This policy should foster stronger systemic growth.

Economic Projections of the Federal Reserve

The Fed expects that as the economy slows,  unemployment is projected to rise to 4.5% from the current level of 4.2%. Inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is running at 3.5% this year, approximately 50 basis points higher than the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index of 3.0%, with 1.6% of this  inflation  attributed to tariffs. The Fed expects PCE Inflation  to ease to 2.4% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. The Federal Reserve anticipates cutting the effective  federal funds rate, currently at 433 basis points (according to the New York Fed), by 50 basis points by the end of 2025, followed by an additional 25 basis points in each of the next two years. This aligns with our own Fed Funds rate  model’s current equilibrium federal funds rate of  3.85% . The Fed Outlook  supports our scenario of a slowing US economy and rate cuts in the second half of 2025 and beyond. A falling US dollar is then expected to exert upward pressure on commodity prices, benefiting Australian Equity markets.

Taking questions during the Press Conference after releasing the Fed statement  ,Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell,   addressed the certainty and uncertainty surrounding the inflationary effects of tariffs. Initially, at the start of 2025, the inflationary impact of tariff policies was unclear, but three months of favourable inflation data have provided this clarity, indicating that the inflationary effects are less severe than anticipated. Powell noted that the Feds own uncertainty on the inflationary effects of  tariffs  peaked in April 2025, and the Federal Reserve now has a clearer understanding that  the inflation effects, are lower than initially expected.

The Fed view  supports our own scenario of a slowing US economy in the second half of 2025, allowing for Fed rate cuts  . This in turn should then lead to  a falling US dollar, which we in turn  expect to drive rising commodity prices.

Read more
The Your Wealth publication is our half yearly scrutiny into current affairs for wealth management. Our latest Issue 29 is out now.

The second half of 2025 will be an interesting time for everyone. Geopolitical uncertainty prevails. How will all of this impact the Australian investor and in particular, their wealth and retirement savings? Whether you are an accumulator, saving for short- and long-term goals, or a retiree, hoping for a comfortable retirement, the ability to manage this uncertainty will be key.

When we published the previous Your Wealth – First Half 2025, the Division 296 Bill (Div296) was also facing uncertainty. The Bill was eventually blocked in the Senate prior to the Federal Election. The Labor Party succeeded in winning so it’s Ground Hog Day for Div296. The Government doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the Bill without support from other parties. The Greens are the likely negotiating party but will undoubtably have their own agenda. Regardless, there is a high probability this legislation will be passed once Parliament resumes.

Our message to our clients is to wait until we know more details and to not act in haste.

In addition to our Feature Article which provides further insights on Div296, this edition also Spotlights the Aged Care changes due this year, with the start date pushed back to 1 November.

We hope readers enjoy this edition of Your Wealth.


Morgans clients receive exclusive insights such as access to our latest Your Wealth publication. Contact us today to begin your journey with Morgans.

      
Contact us
      
Read more