Research Notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Strong pricing but underlying conditions remain soft

Brambles
3:27pm
February 23, 2024
BXB’s 1H24 result was above expectations. Key positives: Group EBIT margin rose 160bp to 20.3% driven by growth in CHEP Americas and CHEP EMEA; ROIC increased 200bp to 21.8%; FY24 guidance for earnings and free cash flow was upgraded. Key negatives: CHEP Asia-Pacific EBIT margin fell 240bp to 34.4%; Group like-for-like (LFL) volumes fell 1%, impacted by customer destocking; Management said the contract environment has become more competitive. We increase FY24-26F underlying EBIT by 2%. Our target price rises to $15.65 (from $14.95) and we maintain our Hold rating.

Mid-year could potentially provide the key catalyst

PEXA Group
3:27pm
February 23, 2024
PXA’s 1H24 Group NPATA (A$15m) was down -36% on the pcp, and slightly below consensus (A$17m). This result had been heavily pre-announced and headline figures were largely as expected with FY24 guidance re-affirmed (albeit PXA Exchange margins are tracking slightly above the top end of the range). The key stock catalyst here remains the launch of the 24- hour UK refinance product in the middle of 2024, which management says remains on track. We make nominal changes to our PXA FY24F/FY25F EBITDA forecasts (+1%-2%) but our NPATA forecasts fall by -22%/-4% on higher non-operating items, e.g. specified items and D&A, etc. Our valuation rises to A$12.19 on higher future operating earnings and a valuation roll-forward. HOLD maintained.

1H24 earnings: Lace up

Accent Group
3:27pm
February 23, 2024
EBIT was 4% lower than forecast and down 11% on a pro forma basis. AX1 said it does not believe consumer demand has changed “fundamentally”, but there is a “little bit of softness” at present. AX1 has performed best where its brands are “hot” (such as HOKA). Against elevated comps, LFLs were resilient at (0.6)% in the first half and have started 2H24 at a similar pace. The comps get less demanding as the half goes on and we expect positive LFLs in 2H24 as a whole. This resilience is a function of the portfolio effect and strong market position. We have lowered our EBIT estimates by 2% in FY24 and FY25 due to higher D&A and retain an Add rating and $2.30 target price.

1H mixed- the end of “market dislocation”?

Ansell
3:27pm
February 23, 2024
1H was mixed, with an inline double-digit earnings decline, but on softer revenue and underlying profit. OPM expanded in Industrial on manufacturing efficiencies and carryover pricing, but was more than offset by contracting margins in Healthcare on continued inventory destocking and slowing of production to address inflated inventories. While a 2H recovery appears reasonable, as a proportion of earnings is driven by cost-outs/efficiencies, we remain cautious on the end of this multi-year “market dislocation” especially as gains are reliant on exogenous factors (eg supportive macros and limited customer destocking), while APIP unfolds over time. While FY24-26 estimates move lower, we roll forward valuation multiples with our DCF/SOTP PT increasing to A$22.53. Hold.

Improved cost control sees margin expansion

Wagners
3:27pm
February 23, 2024
Whilst the result was largely pre-released, the underlying 1HFY24 EBIT of $20.0m reflects a significant improvement on the $4.4m achieved in the pcp. The construction materials division was the primary driver, where EBIT increased 95% on the pcp as improved prices, volumes and cost control saw EBIT margins increase to 11.8% (1H23: 7.4%). The result really points to the cyclical nature of the industry and WGN’s leverage to an improving cycle. The positive operating environment, combined with continued M&A across the industry (ABC, BLD, CSR all receiving bids) all bode well for WGN. On this basis we have changed our recommendation to an ADD rating (previously Speculative Buy) reflecting lower earnings and valuation risk, whilst leaving our target price unchanged at $1.15/sh.

Not as clean as hoped

Medibank
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
MPL’s 1H24 underlying NPAT (A$263m) was +16% on the pcp, and -1% below company-compiled consensus (A$266m).  We saw this as a bit of a mixed result overall. Whilst the Health Insurance (HI) claims environment remains favourable, revised FY24 HI policyholder guidance and management expense growth guidance both disappointed. We make relatively nominal changes to our MPL FY24F/FY25F EPS of -1%/+2% reflecting lower claims forecasts, reduced policyholder growth expectations and higher HI operating expenses. Our PT is set at A$3.73 (previously A$3.76). The current operating environment still appears relatively favourable for MPL, but we see the stock as fair value trading on ~19x FY24F PE. HOLD maintained

No news is good news

Pilbara Minerals
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
PLS reported a soft 1H24 earnings result against consensus expectations, but given there was no significant news and the stock is highly shorted, the miss did not move the stock price greatly. 1H24 underlying EBITDA of A$415m was -8% vs Visible Alpha consensus, while underlying NPAT of A$273m was -15% vs consensus. P680 and P1000 projects are on schedule and budget. FY24 capex guidance reduce to manages costs. Maintain our Add rating with a $4.50ps Target Price. Besides the miss a quiet result for PLS. We expect the stock to re-rate in a broader lithium recovery.

Earnings supported by acquisitions and inflation

APA Group
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
We expect c.1% consensus EBITDA downgrades given first-time FY24 EBITDA guidance that at the mid-point indicates 9-10% growth over FY23. No change to DPS guidance. We layer in higher costs and capex beyond FY24. HOLD retained. 12 month target price $7./sh. At current prices, we estimate a 12 month TSR of c.-3% (incl. 6.9% cash yield) and a five year IRR of c.6% pa.

Everything, everywhere, all at once

Mineral Resources
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
Expanding vertical integration remains a key ambition, with MIN focused on increasing the proportion of controllables in its business. A solid 1H24 underlying result, although with part of the strength driven by higher-than-expected revenue across iron ore and mining services. Management revealed plans to grow Onslow to 50mtpa, and a view it might achieve as much as 12x EBITDA on the partial sell down of its haul road. We maintain an Add rating with an updated A$71ps Target Price (was A$72).

Organic growth supported by sector tailwinds

Qualitas
3:27pm
February 22, 2024
QAL has seen FUM growth of 41% (yoy), with Fee Earning FUM increasing 25% (yoy), leaving c.$2.1bn of dry powder to underpin future earnings growth. The 1H24 result saw funds management revenue increase 25% (yoy), while principal income increased 31% (yoy) off strong underwriting volumes, to deliver underlying Group NPAT of $12.6m, up 24% on the pcp, 4.6% above our expectations and 3.0% above VA consensus. QAL continues to deliver organic earnings growth of c.25% pa (based on FY24 guidance), the growth centered on a nascent residential property cycle upswing driven by unmet housing demand, along with stabilising construction prices and apartment price growth restoring development feasibilities. It is on this basis that we reiterate our ADD recommendation with a $3.10/sh price target.

News & Insights

From Houthi attacks on Suez Canal shipping to Trump’s Operation Rough Rider and Iran’s nuclear facility strikes, explore how these events shape oil prices.

At the beginning of the week, I was asked to write something about Iran. When I started looking at what had been happening , I realised that what we were talking about begins with an action by a proxy of Iran back in November 2023. How  that was initially handled with the Biden regime, and how then it was dealt with  deftly by Trump this year,   in turn led to  the need for an attack on Iran's nuclear facility.

Winston Churchill noted in his first volume of his history of the Second World War that it was important to understand that the United States is primarily a naval power. Indeed, the US remains the world dominant naval power. As such, two major strategic concerns remain for the US : the control of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal .

To the US The idea that another country might block access to either of these must be intolerable. Yet what began happening, beginning on the 19th November 2023, was that , Houthi rebels that controlled a the northern part of a small country in southwestern Arabia, began to act. These Houthi rebels were acting as a proxy for Iran. They were funded by Iran, and armed with Ship-killing rockets, by Iran.

By February 2024, they had attacked 40 ships which had been attempting to sail northwards towards the Suez Canal. By March 2024, 200 ships had been diverted away from the Suez Canal and forced to make the longer and more expensive voyage around the Cape of Good Hope of South Africa. At this point, I think The Economist magazine said that this was the most severe Suez crisis since the 1950s.

The U.S. did respond. On the 18th December 2023, the U.S. had announced an international maritime force to break the Houthi blockade. On the 10th January, the UN National Security Council adopted a resolution demanding a cessation of Houthi attacks on merchant vessels.

As of the 2nd January 2024, the Houthis had already recorded 931 American and British airstrikes against sites in Yemen. Then Trump came to power. To Trump, the idea of the proxy of Iran blockading the Suez Canal could not be tolerated.

From the 15th March 2025, Trump began "Operatation  Rough Rider". This was named for the cavalry commanded by the then-future President Theodore Roosevelt, who charged up San Juan Hill in Cuba during the Spanish-American War of 1898. The U.S. then hit the Houthis with over a thousand airstrikes. So they were bombing at ten times the rate they previously had been. The result of that was that by the 6th March 2025, Trump announced that the Houthis, these proxies of Iran, had capitulated as part of a ceasefire brokered by Oman. This directly led to the main game.

It was obvious that the decision to do the unthinkable, and block the Suez Canal, had come from Iran.
What other unthinkable things was Iran considering?

It is obvious that Trump now believed that the next unthinkable thing that Iran was considering was nuclear weapons. As Iran's other proxies collapsed, Iran's air defence collapsed. In turn, this gave Trump the room to act, and he took it. He launched a bombing raid which severely disabled Iran's nuclear capacity. Some say it completely destroyed it.

Iran retaliated by launching 14 rockets at the American base in Qatar, warning the Americans this was going to happen, and this had no other effect than allowing Iran to announce a glorious victory by themselves over the Americans. Iran had thought the unthinkable and had achieved what was, to them, as a result, an unthinkable reverse.

The ceasefire that has followed has been interpreted by markets as a relief from major risk. Now, the major effect of this on markets has been a dramatic rocketing in the oil price, followed by a fall in the oil price. So I thought I’d look at the fundamentals of the oil price, from running two of my models of the Brent price, using current fundamentals.

Now, the simplest model that I’ve got explains 63% of monthly variation of the Brent oil price. And it’s based on two things. One is the level of stocks in the U.S., which are published every week by the Energy Information Administration .  Those stocks are  down a bit in the most recent months because this is the summer driving season where oil stocks are being drawn down to provide higher demand for gasoline. So that’s a positive thing. And the other thing that I’ve been talking about this year is that I think  we’re going to see a steady fall in the U.S. dollar, and that’s going to generate the beginning of a recovery in commodities prices. So if I also put the U.S. dollar index into this model, it gives me an equilibrium model now of $78.96. And that’s about $US12  higher than the oil price was this morning.

If I strengthen that model by adding the U.S. CPI, because, you know, the cost of production cost of oil raises over time, that increases the power of the model . And that lifts the equilibrium price very considerably to $97 a barrel, which is $30 a barrel higher than it currently is. So I regard that as my medium-term model, and the first one is my short-term model.

What’s really interesting is that the U.S. dollar  has continued to fall.  That puts further upward pressure  on the oil price. So in spite of this crisis having been solved, I think we’re going to see more upward price action on the oil price by the end of the year.

Read more
The US economy is growing strongly at 2.34% in Q2 2025 but is expected to slow to 1.4% in 2025, with falling interest rates and a weaker US dollar likely to boost commodity prices, benefiting Australian markets. Michael Knox discusses.

We think the US economy is currently experiencing solid growth, with data from the Chicago Fed  National Activity Index indicating an annual growth rate of just above  2%. This aligns with projections from other parts of the Federal Reserve System, such as the New York Fed. The New York Fed’s weekly Nowcast, updated every Friday, estimates that for the second quarter of 2025, the US economy is growing at an annualised rate of 2.34%, surpassing the 2% mark. This robust growth is consistent with our model’s view that the US economy is now performing strongly. However, we anticipate a slowdown in the second half of 2025.

On 18 June the Fed released its Summary of Economic Projections  with the Federal Reserve’s  forecasting US GDP growth to drop to 1.4% in 2025, down from their March estimate of 1.7%. Looking further ahead, growth is expected to pick up slightly to 1.6% in 2026 and 1.8% in 2027, aligning with the long-term trend growth rate of around 1.8%. We believe this recovery trend could be even  higher,  driven by reduced regulation under the second Trump administration and aggressive tax write-offs for companies building factories in the US, allowing 100% write-offs for equipment and buildings in the first year. This policy should foster stronger systemic growth.

Economic Projections of the Federal Reserve

The Fed expects that as the economy slows,  unemployment is projected to rise to 4.5% from the current level of 4.2%. Inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is running at 3.5% this year, approximately 50 basis points higher than the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index of 3.0%, with 1.6% of this  inflation  attributed to tariffs. The Fed expects PCE Inflation  to ease to 2.4% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. The Federal Reserve anticipates cutting the effective  federal funds rate, currently at 433 basis points (according to the New York Fed), by 50 basis points by the end of 2025, followed by an additional 25 basis points in each of the next two years. This aligns with our own Fed Funds rate  model’s current equilibrium federal funds rate of  3.85% . The Fed Outlook  supports our scenario of a slowing US economy and rate cuts in the second half of 2025 and beyond. A falling US dollar is then expected to exert upward pressure on commodity prices, benefiting Australian Equity markets.

Taking questions during the Press Conference after releasing the Fed statement  ,Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell,   addressed the certainty and uncertainty surrounding the inflationary effects of tariffs. Initially, at the start of 2025, the inflationary impact of tariff policies was unclear, but three months of favourable inflation data have provided this clarity, indicating that the inflationary effects are less severe than anticipated. Powell noted that the Feds own uncertainty on the inflationary effects of  tariffs  peaked in April 2025, and the Federal Reserve now has a clearer understanding that  the inflation effects, are lower than initially expected.

The Fed view  supports our own scenario of a slowing US economy in the second half of 2025, allowing for Fed rate cuts  . This in turn should then lead to  a falling US dollar, which we in turn  expect to drive rising commodity prices.

Read more
The Your Wealth publication is our half yearly scrutiny into current affairs for wealth management. Our latest Issue 29 is out now.

The second half of 2025 will be an interesting time for everyone. Geopolitical uncertainty prevails. How will all of this impact the Australian investor and in particular, their wealth and retirement savings? Whether you are an accumulator, saving for short- and long-term goals, or a retiree, hoping for a comfortable retirement, the ability to manage this uncertainty will be key.

When we published the previous Your Wealth – First Half 2025, the Division 296 Bill (Div296) was also facing uncertainty. The Bill was eventually blocked in the Senate prior to the Federal Election. The Labor Party succeeded in winning so it’s Ground Hog Day for Div296. The Government doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the Bill without support from other parties. The Greens are the likely negotiating party but will undoubtably have their own agenda. Regardless, there is a high probability this legislation will be passed once Parliament resumes.

Our message to our clients is to wait until we know more details and to not act in haste.

In addition to our Feature Article which provides further insights on Div296, this edition also Spotlights the Aged Care changes due this year, with the start date pushed back to 1 November.

We hope readers enjoy this edition of Your Wealth.


Morgans clients receive exclusive insights such as access to our latest Your Wealth publication. Contact us today to begin your journey with Morgans.

      
Contact us
      
Read more