Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

This chicken needs some gravy

Inghams
3:27pm
August 24, 2025
ING’s FY25 result came in at the lower end of guidance and missed consensus estimates after a challenging 4Q25. FY25 was impacted by one less trading week vs the pcp, weakness in all channels given cost of living pressures and the new Woolworths (WOW) contract. The Wholesale price was also extremely weak. FY26 guidance was materially weaker than expected. ING expects a challenging 1H26, followed by solid growth in the 2H26. More normalised operating conditions should eventuate in FY27. We have made significant revisions to our forecasts. After the severe share price reaction, we upgrade to a Hold rating. With a weak 1H26 result, ING is lacking near term catalysts, however we have seen the company recover from these issues in the past. ING’s attractive fully franked dividend yield will also likely provide some degree of share price support.

Continuing to truck along

AMA Group
3:27pm
August 24, 2025
AMA reported a positive FY25 result, beating the top-end of guidance, delivering ongoing FCF generation and continuing to rebound strongly. We continue to view value in the name as the business continues to meaningfully execute on the business turnaround and progress towards its aspirational ~10% medium-term EBITDA margin target. We are encouraged by the operational progress and continue to see good value in the name in-light of the strong near-term growth profile. Accumulate maintained.

Multiple levers to pull for growth

Brambles
3:27pm
August 24, 2025
BXB delivered a solid FY25 result despite a challenging macroeconomic environment, particularly in the US. Margin improvement, driven by continued gains in asset efficiency and productivity, was once again a key highlight. While like-for-like (LFL) volumes were 1% lower, this was more than offset by net new business wins with momentum improving through the year. Management is targeting further margin improvement in FY26 with guidance for constant FX sales growth of 3-5% and underlying EBIT growth of 8-11%. The company has also upgraded its FY28 margin improvement target (vs FY24 levels) to 300bp vs 200bp previously, supported by supply chain productivity, asset efficiency and overhead productivity. We increase FY26-28F underlying EBIT by between 5-7%. We raise our target price to $25.70 (from $19.75), reflecting updated earnings forecasts and a higher PE-based valuation multiple of 24x (up from 19.5x). This uplift reflects our increased confidence in management’s ability to drive sales growth through new business wins and continued margin improvement via efficiency gains. With a 12-month forecast TSR of 2%, we move to a HOLD rating (from TRIM). We may adopt a more positive stance should the share price pull back.

Delivering to plan

Vysarn
3:27pm
August 24, 2025
FY25 was pre-released so contained no real surprises. Earnings were in line with expectations and financials were similarly there or thereabouts. The qualitative divisional outlook commentary is upbeat. Importantly, the Industrial division, which was plagued by chronic underutilisation in 1H, is off to a strong start in FY26. Our forecast changes are de minimis, with our PBT estimates for FY26-27 unchanged. We forecast +30% organic EPS growth in FY26, though the company has significant balance sheet and management bandwidth to make further acquisitions. Additionally, given VAM has been further de-risked, we increase our risk-weighting to 75% (from 50%). This sees our target price rise to $A0.64 (from $A0.58).

Momentum building in Defence

VEEM
3:27pm
August 24, 2025
VEE’s FY25 result was largely in line with guidance (revenue, EBITDA and NPAT) provided last week. The one surprise however was the dividend with no 2H25 dividend declared. This looks to be in anticipation of future growth with VEE investing in additional robotics and other capital equipment in FY25. The company also increased its borrowing capacity so holding back the dividend will give it extra capacity to gear up for FY26. VEE has made two significant announcements related to its Defence business over the past week: 1) Renewed contract with Australian Submarine Corp (ASC) for a further 6 years, valued at $65m; and 2) Received approved supplier status for the Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding (HII-NNS) Australian Submarine Supplier Qualification (AUSSQ) program that will allow VEE to enter the US submarine shipbuilding supply chain. We see these developments as positive for VEE’s future growth potential in the Defence sector. We have revised down our FY26-28 EBITDA forecasts by between 14-23%, reflecting lower assumed sales growth for gyros (which are likely to remain volatile) and propellers (given limited progress with the Sharrow partnership to date). We have also reduced our margin assumptions accordingly. Our target price declines to $1.30 (from $1.50) and we maintain our BUY rating. We continue to believe in VEE’s long-term growth potential, supported by sizeable addressable markets in propellers (US$2.7bn) and gyros (US$14.6bn), as well as an increasingly positive outlook in Defence - a sector VEE has served since 1988.

Short-term volatility, long-term fertility

Monash IVF
3:27pm
August 22, 2025
MVF delivered a FY25 result with revenue and EBITDA slightly ahead of expectations, offset by higher depreciation and interest, while underlying NPAT of A$27.4m landed in line with guidance. However, FY26 guidance was well below expectations with a weak 2H25 exit rate expected to continue into 1H26 combined with cost pressures and one-offs following independent review recommendation implementations. As it stands, MVF remains a long-term thematic play with a medium-term turnaround opportunity with strong structural growth drivers still firmly intact. We have revised down our short-term forecasts and set our target price at $A0.96 (was A$1.00). We maintain a SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation.

Locked and loaded

PWR Holdings Limited
3:27pm
August 22, 2025
PWH delivered a stronger-than-expected FY25 result, though its margin outlook was more subdued. Management expects FY26 NPAT margin to be modestly higher than FY25. While we had anticipated a quicker ramp up on the back of productivity gains from the new Australian manufacturing facility, these benefits will be partly offset by higher costs associated with the factory in addition to other costs such as tariffs, US cybersecurity accreditation, and the search for a permanent CEO. We make minimal changes to FY26-28F revenue but decrease underlying NPAT by between 12-27%. We forecast underlying NPAT margin to return to FY24 levels (~18%) in FY29, which is consistent with management’s expectations. We believe our forecasts are conservative with potential upside if PWH can execute well. We lower our target price to $8.50 (from $8.80) and revise our rating to ACCUMULATE (previously BUY). We continue to view PWH as a high-quality business, supported by a strong balance sheet, an experienced management team, and access to large addressable markets that offer significant growth potential. While some disruption is expected in 1H26 as PWH completes the final phase of its relocation, we remain positive on the outlook for 2H26 and beyond.

Defensively positioned

GQG Partners
3:27pm
August 22, 2025
GQG reported 1H25 NPAT of US$230m +13% on pcp and flat half-on-half. Operating performance was in-line, with the result slightly ahead on higher performance fees and non-operating income vs expectations. Short-term relative investment underperformance is in focus given the potential to lead to an outflow period. The group’s longer-term track record and risk adjusted metrics remain solid, however we do expect flows to slow materially and potentially see outflow pockets. The August FUM update points to no major outflows post the July update. At this point, we view it as more sentiment risk than earnings risk. Whilst we view lower FUM is effectively priced in (<8x FY25 PE) and minor outflows will have negligible earnings impact, a period of outflows will limit a re-rate. We maintain a HOLD recommendation, preferring to allow the current ‘flows risk’ period to reduce before taking a more positive stance. Our fundamental valuation is A$2.65ps. However, we temporarily set our price target at a discount to align our fundamental view (Hold/neutral) to our recommendation structure.

FY25 result

Regis Resources
3:27pm
August 22, 2025
FY25 was a ground-breaking year for RRL, achieving record revenue, cash balance, EBITDA and NPAT which drove a fully franked 5cps dividend, the first dividend since 2022. Looking to FY26, we expect continued disciplined delivery against production and CAPEX guidance. Assuming sustained commodity prices, we anticipate further strong earnings and cash generation, providing scope for ongoing capital management or growth initiatives. No formal capital management framework has been outlined. We maintain our ACCUMULATE rating with a price target of A$5.00ps (previously A$5.10ps). Noting RRL offers significant torque to the price of gold, at spot prices our price target would lift to A$6.02ps.

Data centre deployment underway

Goodman Group
3:27pm
August 22, 2025
GMG continues its growth trajectory, with FY26 guidance to see EPS increase 9% (vs pcp). The data centre buildout gathers pace and now represents 57% of Work In Progress (WIP) and will likely drive a higher production rate over the medium term (a key driver of development earnings). We continue to see the opportunity in GMG, which offers one of the highest quality exposures amongst our REIT coverage. So, whilst upside is limited, GMG offers long run exposure to a substantial data centre deployment and the stock remains a core portfolio holding, hence the ACCUMULATE recommendation and $38.40/sh price target.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more