Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Stretched too thin: Downgrade to Hold

Domino's Pizza
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
We got this one wrong. We thought it possible that Domino’s would snap its streak of missing estimates in 1H24 and deliver a return to growth as sales momentum continued to recover. Domino’s issued a trading update that indicated same store sales have gapped down in Japan, weighing on group earnings and calling into question the strength of the consumer proposition in that market. 1H24 PBT will be $87-90m, below our forecast of $100m and consensus of $103m. We still believe Domino’s will get back to steady same store sales growth and network expansion in time, but it’s taking longer than we expected and the shares are likely to underperform for a while until the company has regained investor confidence. We downgrade from Add to Hold with a $50.00 target price (was $61.00).

System pressures capping near-term upside

IDP Education
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
Canada has announced a two-year cap on new International student visas, expecting to reduce CY24 approvals by ~35% vs CY23. In isolation, earnings impacts from tightening migration and international student policy settings across the major destinations; and visa changes impacting IELTs volumes are manageable. In aggregate, we expect a lower med-term growth profile. The UK election (2HCY24) arguably increases policy risk in the UK. We expect IEL to report a strong 1H24 result, driven by the strength in Student Placement (SP), partially offset with weaker IELTs volume. This composition is arguably weaker, forward looking, given the softening SP growth outlook. IEL continues to offer strong long-term growth. However, we expect uncertainty on announced (and potential) policy change impacts to weigh on the stock. Despite a strong upcoming result, we move to Hold, preferring to have increased confidence in med-term (FY25) earnings at this stage.

A hard earned re-rate

Stanmore Resources
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
4Q production again proved strong but we’re cautious re approaching wet weather. We make several adjustments, trimming our valuation/ target slightly to $4.20ps. Introduction of dividends strongly builds SMR’s appeal to a wider investor base. We maintain an Add, but do note upside has narrowed on SMR’s re-rating. 1H Sales disruption and tepid steel markets could easily uncover better value.

In the doghouse for a while

Nanosonics
3:27pm
January 24, 2024
NAN released a negative trading update, citing hospital budgetary pressures deferring purchasing decisions around new and replacement Trophon units. The timing of the update was surprising to us, and while market trust has clearly diminished following the announcement, we expect management to navigate and adjust as needed. The key will be more detailed guidance at the February result, and while we see the stock as deserving of a de-rate, we continue to see significant value in the install base, superiority over competitors, and Coris potential. Our target price reduces to A$3.88 and we retain our Add recommendation.

Two steps forward one step back

Cooper Energy
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
COE posted a solid 2Q’FY24 production and sales result, while a budget blowout at BMG increases the short-term drag on COE’s balance sheet. 2Q24 group production was 5.68PJe (vs MorgE/consensus 5.4/5.5PJe). New record daily production rate reached at Orbost of 67tj/d. Increased BMG abandonment budget of A$240-$280m (was A$193-$198m). We maintain an Add rating, with an A$0.25ps target price (was A$0.26).

Revises guidance on equipment failure

Karoon Energy
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
KAR has provided an operational update following clearing of the hydrate issue at the SPS88 well, and subsequent mechanical failure. The surface issues are expected to persist until Q4’CY24, with a backlog on regulator approvals currently in Brazil delaying the work required to fix SPS88. KAR has revised CY24 group production guidance to 11.2-13.5mmboe (vs MorgE 12.6mmboe). We maintain an Add rating, with an updated A$2.80ps target price (previously A$2.95).

2Q24 helped by favourable market movements

Generation Development Group
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
GDG’s 2Q24 quarterly update saw a strong Investment bond (IB) sales performance of ~A$156m (+37% on the pcp), albeit with netflows below our expectations (+A$91m versus +A$106m) on higher outflows.  The standout in the quarterly was the very strong IB investment performance (+A$140m), which helped drive FUM up a healthy ~9% over the period. We lift our GDG FY24F/FY25F EPS by 1%-3% on higher IB FUM forecasts in all years. Our target price is set at A$2.01 (previously A$1.91). We continue to believe GDG is well positioned to execute a compound earnings growth story over time. ADD maintained.

Performing stronger than expected

Judo Capital Holdings
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
JDO released its unaudited 1H24 result and outlook for 2H24 (and into FY25), which were ahead of expectations. We make material upgrades to forecasts to align with performance and outlook. 12 month target price lifted 8% to $1.50/share, due to forecast changes. ADD.

Executing on asset sales

Garda Property Group
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
GDF‘s focus remains on capital recycling initiatives and executing on the current development pipeline. During 1H24, GDF has executed on asset sales totalling +$100m which will be used to pay down debt and recycle into industrial developments, particularly North Lakes. Post settlement of the Botanicca 7 and 9 office assets in February, we estimate GDF’s portfolio will be valued at +$460m and will be 80% weighted towards industrial (SE QLD) with the sole office asset the Cairns Corporate Tower (BV $82m). At the upcoming result on 8 February we expect FY24 DPS guidance of 6.3c to be reiterated however likely with a higher payout ratio and FFO guidance to be lower given the timing between asset sales and new industrial developments completing. GDF usually revalues assets around April/May so updates will likely fall after the 1H result however the Richlands industrial development may be revalued prior to this (10 year lease commences 2024). We retain an Add rating with a revised price target of $1.65.

Delays to US commercial rollout

Proteomics International Laboratories
3:27pm
January 23, 2024
PIQ have released its quarterly report in concert to an institutional placement and founder sell-down however key update around US rollout disappoints, now expected in Q2CY24 (3-6 month delay). We worked under the assumption that PIQ and SHUSA remained on track for initial launch to shortly follow with the effective date for Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement, but as we’ve highlighted in the past – dealing with these larger institutions can come at cost to timelines often being less nimble and incentivised to condense timelines. We have adjusted expectations on our US commercialisation and associated risks to market penetration and roll through new share issuance. Our target price reduces to A$1.38 (from A$2.42) and we retain our Speculative Buy recommendation.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more