Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Set up for success

Tasmea
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
FY25 contained limited surprises given TEA reaffirmed FY25 statutory NPAT guidance of $52m on 25/06. The company reiterated its FY26 guidance for $110m EBIT (+48% YoY) and $70m NPAT (+35% YoY). The company has also called out targets, which relates to senior management teams LTIs, for $135m EBIT by FY28 and $160m by FY29 (as well as +15% organic growth within Tasman Power). For FY28, we are forecasting $140m. Our thesis on TEA is simple. With significant leverage to Rio Tinto’s Pilbara (iron ore) spend and BHP’s South Australia (copper) spend, we see tailwinds for the next 18-24 months which will drive strong organic growth in Civils. Moreover, electrification trends across Australia will drive strong organic growth in Electrical over the medium to long term. FY26 EBIT guidance of $110m vs $93m in FY25 (pro-forma) supports this view, implying +18% organic EBIT growth in FY26.

Pressure from all sides

Reece
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
While REH’s FY25 EBIT of $548m was at the bottom end of management’s guidance range of $548-558m provided in late June, the outlook remains uncertain in both ANZ and the US as the company deals with a soft housing market, cost inflation, and increased competitive threats. Management anticipates a slow recovery in ANZ with a period of soft activity still to play out. In the US, the housing market is expected to be constrained for the next 12-18 months driven by persistently high mortgage rates and affordability challenges. We decrease FY26-28F group EBIT by between 10-12%. For FY26, we forecast earnings to be lower in both regions compared to a modest improvement previously. We note however that forward visibility remains low. Our target price falls to $11.10 (from $14.80) and we downgrade our rating to TRIM (from HOLD). While we continue to view REH as a fundamentally good business with a strong culture and long track record of growth, the operating environment remains tough (particularly in the US) with further downside risk to earnings forecasts if housing conditions remain weak and competitive pressures intensify.

Worth another look

Tourism Holdings Rentals Limited
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
THL’s FY25 result was slightly above recent guidance. The 2H25 was particularly weak given political and economic uncertainty weighed on consumer confidence and impacted RV sales and margins. Outside of the US, THL’s FY26 outlook comments for its Rentals business were strong. The 1H26 should hopefully prove to the bottom of the cycle for RV sales and margins. THL’s valuation metrics are undemanding, and it has material leverage to an improved economic cycle. We consequently upgrade to a BUY recommendation.

Additional result detail shows breadth of performance

Regal Partners
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
Whilst largely pre-released, RPL delivered a strong set of results for the half year, a function of positive investment performance and net inflows, both of which came despite the challenges faced in 1Q25 (namely market volatility and the OPT holding). A key call out was the persistency of performance fees, which provides scope for further upside to our estimates, should equity markets improve. Given our conservative approach to the valuation of performance fees and principal income, we see little change to our target price of $3.70/sh, reiterating our Buy rating.

Confidence levels are lifting

Data#3
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
DTL’s FY25 result was largely in line with expectations. OPEX in 2H25 was lower than we had expected and shows strong cost discipline, once again from DTL. As expected, no quantifiable FY26 guidance was provided. However, management were incrementally more positive about being able to offset the gross profit hit from Microsoft rebate changes and now expect software to be broadly flat YoY. This is a good outcome which shows the levers management are pulling are working. We upgrade our EPS forecasts and lift our Target Price to $8.30.

A mixed bag

Endeavour Group
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
EDV’s FY25 result overall was slightly weaker than expected. A decline in Retail earnings due to subdued consumer spending was partly offset by a slight improvement in Hotels earnings. Retail sales in the early part of FY26 have remained subdued while Hotels has gotten off to a solid start. We decrease FY26-28F group EBIT by between 5-6%. Our target price declines to $4.15 (from $4.35) on the back of adjustments to earnings forecasts. With a 12-month TSR of 5%, we move to a HOLD rating (from ACCUMULATE). While retail liquor demand is expected to improve as inflation moderates and interest rates decline, the timing and extent of any uplift remains uncertain. In contrast, the outlook for Hotels is more positive with benefits from the network renewal program beginning to materialise. However, we think short-term upside for EDV’s share price may be limited with the outcome of the portfolio review not expected until 2H26 and the long-term strategy remains unclear.

1H25: Taking confidence in predictability

Dalrymple Bay Infrastructure
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
DBI’s 1H25 result was in-line with expectations, supported by the strong risk mitigants benefitting the business. Mild forecast upgrades. 12 month target price set at $4.73 (+3 cps). We recommend existing investors continue to HOLD given DBI’s expected inclusion in the S&P/ASX 200 Index at the September rebalance (albeit index-related buying may be a contributing factor to recent share price strength). There may also be further buying support if Brookfield sells down its remaining substantial position in the stock thereby increasing DBI’s index weighting.

Targeting FY26 gains against persistent headwinds

Lindsay Australia
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
LAU’s FY25 result was in line with the midpoint of its FY25 guidance, and largely consistent with consensus/MorgF expectations. Group revenue increased 5.3% to $859m but EBITDA (pre AASB16) declined -11.7% yoy to $81.4m due to cost pressures and imbalances across LAU’s transport division (driving margin deleverage, which was further exacerbated by 2H25 seasonality). LAU expects cost pressures and competition to remain near-term headwinds into FY26, however strategic initiatives will focus on delivering efficiency gains, asset utilisation and acquisition synergies. Our Underlying EBITDA forecasts reduce by -4% in FY26-FY27F reflecting a more conservative recovery in conditions. This sees our target price reduce to $0.80ps (from A$0.85). We retain a BUY rating

In the depths of hashing out a deal

Santos
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
In the depths of hashing out a binding agreement Santos management were never going to be able to give definitive answers many were after in their market call. But what they have done is provided some useful structure around what is happening behind the scenes, with the expectation of an accepted binding offer by 19 Sep. Earnings quality remained solid in the first half despite revenue headwinds. Interim dividend was strong at US13.4 cents, confident it can manage CF/debt. Net debt is uncomfortably high, increasing sensitivity to oil price volatility, and likely to dictate a much slower pace of investment in next 3-5 years. Not without its risks, but we do believe a successful deal is probable. Maintain ACCUMLATE rating and unchanged A$8.65 target price.

Margins start to turn the corner

Peter Warren Automotive
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
PWR reported FY25 underlying NPBT of A$22.3m, down ~61% on pcp. 2H markedly improved (including a strong June), up ~114% half-on-half. Gross margins have generally stabilised and PWR should see medium-term upside as certain OEM performance improves. Improved inventory management, lower interest rates, and focused cost control will also assist near-term. PWR’s outlook statements point to a stabilised margin environment and a focus on higher margin revenue areas. With earnings stability, M&A can recommence. We maintain a HOLD recommendation. Margins have likely bottomed, however valuation on a reasonable recovery (FY27) looks fair. Execution on the consolidation strategy provides upside medium-term.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more