Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Through the worst of it

Helloworld
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
While HLO’s FY25 result was well down on the pcp, after a stronger than expected 2H25, it beat expectations. HLO’s outlook comments were relatively upbeat and it highlighted its strong forward bookings. New acquisitions should also underpin solid earnings growth in FY26. We have upgraded our forecasts. Given HLO’s undemanding trading multiples, improved trading conditions, and contribution from new acquisitions, we upgrade to a BUY rating. In FY26, it will be interesting to watch HLO’s next move regarding its ~17% stake in WJL.

Watching brief

Intelligent Monitoring Group
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
The FY25 result was messy considering earnings had effectively been pre-released last month at the 4C. The accounts remain unaudited as the company awaits specialist advice relating to its ability to use tax credits, though the company is confident in its tax position. While unaudited EBITDA was within the margin of error vs last disclosure ($38.4m vs $38.6m), higher depreciation saw EBITA -4% vs MorgansF. Additionally, exercise of warrants from a previous re-financing (2023) saw 18.7m shares issued (~5% dilution). The trifecta of unaudited accounts, a slight EBITA miss and dilution caused significant share price weakness today. We retain our Speculative Buy rating but reduce our target price to 85c (from 90c) on a higher share count and slightly lower earnings. FY26 earnings guidance will be provided at the AGM in November.

The road to recovery more than a 2H25 turnaround

Johns Lyng Group
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
JLG delivered a solid FY25 result reaching consensus expectations and achieving FY25 guidance, reflecting a monumental 2H25 turnaround. Group EBITDA of $126.8m (-2.2% yoy) was in line with MorgF of $126m, which included EBITDA of $118m (in line with MorgF of $118.7m), and CAT EBITDA of $8.8m (ahead of MorgF of $7.3m). FY26 guidance however reflected a different story, implying a further -130bps of BAU margin deterioration in the year ahead as a result of latent capacity in the group’s cost base (materially lower than MorgF and consensus expectations). We reduce our EBITDA forecasts by ~11-12% in FY26-FY27F reflecting JLG’s revised revenue and margin guidance. Our target price is in line with the scheme offer of A$4.00/sh, which informs our Hold rating.

Customers are liking the offer

Coles Group
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
While COL’s FY25 result was broadly in line with expectations, the company has made a stronger-than-anticipated start to FY26, particularly in its core Supermarkets division. COL’s Supermarkets offer continues to resonate with customers with strong volume growth enabling the business to successfully absorb a 30% decline in tobacco sales. Despite ongoing customer cautiousness, management said they are seeing signs of green shoots in consumer sentiment following the recent interest rate cuts. We increase FY26-28F underlying EBIT by between 2-3%. Our target price rises to $23.45 (from $20.95), reflecting upgraded earnings forecasts and increased confidence in management’s ability to execute. While we maintain our HOLD rating with a 12-month forecast TSR of 8%, we continue to view COL as a quality business with defensive attributes and structural tailwinds from population growth. We would consider adopting a more positive stance on the stock should the share price weaken.

Continuing to deliver improving profitability

Tyro Payments
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
TYR’s FY25 result was slightly below consensus expectations (-1%-2%) at revenue (A$486m) and EBITDA (A$61.5m), but more in line at NPAT (A$17.6m).  We saw this as a solid result overall, with continuing EBITDA margin improvement arguably the key positive highlight. We lift our normalised PBT forecasts by +15%/+5% over the next two years, mainly on higher EBITDA margin assumptions. We note our EPS forecasts are +15%/-26% over the same timeframe, with our FY27 forecast impacted by TYR beginning to pay tax (which is slightly earlier than we thought). Our price target rises to A$1.67 (from A$1.55). With ~40% upside to our price target (A$1.67), we maintain a BUY rating.

From transition to traction in FY26

Microba Life Sciences
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
MAP reported its FY25 result. Messier result with divestment of the research services division and a contingent liability reversal for its Invivo acquisition, but underlying result was largely in-line with expectations and sets up a solid springboard into FY26 and beyond. Key outlook commentary continues to remain, and FY26 guidance sets the scene for a strong sales period coupled with guiding for breakeven on a regional basis. Our valuation and target price moderates to A$0.29 (from A$0.31) and we retain our SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation.

Built Nanosonics tough

Nanosonics
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
FY25 result was a beat to expectations, supported by strong consumables growth and capital sales growth. Key short-term focus remains installed base growth which beat our pass-mark (>2k units), and early signs of upgrade cycle acceleration across the ageing fleet in North America. Commentary around CORIS launch remains positive and potentially conservative, with phased commercial rollout expected now in FY27 followed by broader adoption in FY28. Timing hinges on FDA 510(k) approvals which we have seen recent evidence of backlog and delays to approvals. However, we view CORIS timing arbitrary over the life-cycle of the device and particularly so with the Trophon business humming along and showing strong operating leverage. No change to positive view or valuation. Target price of A$5.50 remains.

Mixed bag, momentum fades

Ansell
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
FY25 was mixed, with softer underlying top-line results offset by in-line double-digit profit growth, supported by acquisition gains, cost outs and one-off items. Industrial margins reached record highs on new product introductions and cost savings, while Healthcare rebounded strongly as channel inventory destocking and production cuts normalised. While APIP cost savings remain on track, KBU is outperforming and pricing is being used to offset initial US tariffs, underlying earnings momentum is slowing, subsequent price increases risk dampening demand, and a multi-year digital transformation beginning in 2HFY26 could cause disruption. We have adjusted FY26-27 underlying profit up to 1.7%, with our DCF/SOTP price target increasing to A$34.64 (From A$33.38). Hold.

Pipeline building, approvals drawing closer

Imricor Medical Systems
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
IMR posted its 1H25 results which were in line with expectations. Our focus remains on regulatory and clinical progress, which we think will deliver regular news flow over the next 6 to 12 months, maintaining strong investor interest. Our key focus in the Northstar approval in the US (expected in 4Q25) and the progress of the atrial flutter trial (approval expected in 2H26). We have made no changes to forecasts or our target price. We maintain our SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation.

Animal spirits

IMDEX
3:27pm
August 25, 2025
IMD shares have performed strongly since our initiation in June-24 (+55%) as the key lead indicators for exploration have continued to firm. The strength of the exploration cycle is undoubtedly gathering pace. Further outperformance will hinge upon IMD’s ability to maintain market share (as competition intensifies), control costs and ultimately re-capture the strong operating leverage in cycles past. This will dictate whether forecasts in FY26 and beyond are too conservative. The expiry of the time-stamped core orientation tool patent next month adds another layer of uncertainty. We trim our EPS forecasts by 5-6% in each of FY26 and FY27 and stretch our valuation to ~28x FY26 adjusted PE. Our target price rises to $3.45 (from $3.20). We continue to like IMD for pure play exposure to the exploration cycle on which we remain bullish. Given recent share price strength, valuation on our current forecasts offers less upside than previously, so we’re taking a pause for breath and moving to a HOLD.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more