Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Emerging technology could be a scale changer

Shine Justice
3:27pm
September 2, 2025
SHJ reported FY25 adjusted EBITDA of A$38.4m (A$45.0m pcp) and adjusted NPAT of A$9.7m (A$14.5m pcp). Expense discipline was a highlight. The Board reinstated fully franked dividends (5.0cps total) and progressed an on-market buy-back (~2% of issued capital bought back). SHJ expects to achieve solid growth in both the Personal Injury (PI) and Class Actions (CA) practices in FY26 and deliver improved EBITDA and GOCF. SHJ’s growth strategy centres on its renewed focus on two core divisions. Investment in emerging technologies (including AI) is expected to drive operational efficiency, streamline workflows and increase conversion rates. The Class Actions division is expected to benefit from the establishment of diversified portfolio funding to accelerate the pipeline and execution of new Class Action filings. This includes SHJ’s International Mass Tort strategy.

Unearthing opportunities in copper and gold

Aeris Resources
3:27pm
September 2, 2025
We initiate research coverage of Aeris Resources (AIS) with a 12-month target price of A$0.31ps and a SPECULATIVE BUY rating. AIS offers investors leverage to copper and gold through its cornerstone assets in Tritton and Cracow, which support steady near-term cash flow generation. Exploration is central to its near-term strategy, with near-mine extensions and greenfield exploration targets driving potential for mine-life extension and short- to medium-term production growth.

Soft headline numbers but progressing the UK

PEXA Group
3:27pm
September 2, 2025
PXA’s FY25 Group NPATA (A$41m, -6% on the pcp) appeared -11% below consensus, whilst the result was -4% below at EBITDA (A$135m, +7% on the pcp).  Although the result headline figures missed expectations, we think FY25 saw meaningful operational progress in the UK. We also like new CEO Russel Cohen’s mantra of a more targeted approach to overall capital investment. We lower our PXA FY26F/FY27F EPS by >10%, reflecting softer FY26 guidance than expected. Our PXA price target rises to A$16.87 (previously A$16.30) with our earnings changes offset by a valuation roll-forward. With >10% upside to our price target, we move to an Accumulate recommendation.

Guiding for growth with capital strength

Earlypay
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
EPY delivered a solid FY25 result (underlying NPAT +24% to A$5.1m), in a cleaner reset earnings year for the group. Dividends resumed with 0.79c paid. Earning guidance was provided for FY26, with EPY expecting to deliver ~15-20% growth (underlying NPAT ~A$6m). Growth is expected across both core divisions, driven in invoice Finance (IF) by accelerating originations via adjusting margin (higher quality credit); and continuing to build on the momentum in Equipment Finance division with an improved broker experience. EPY has ~A$10m surplus capital (1Q26 company estimate), with an ongoing capital management plan in place. EPY will resume the buy-back; and potentially retain some capital to support accelerated organic growth or bolt-on acquisitions. EPY noted that active discussions relating to a change of control have ceased. Solvar (SVR) now has a ~20% stake in EPY (acquired May-25) and has expressed a strategy to develop its commercial lending business. Based on guidance, EPY is expecting to deliver 15-20% growth; is trading on ~9.5x FY26 PE with a ~6% yield; has an active share buy-back (surplus capital); and corporate interest is still evident with an industry peer at 20% ownership.

Learning to be leaner

IDP Education
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
IEL reported FY25 Adjusted EBIT of A$119.0m, down -48% (2H25 -67% on pcp), a challenged year given continued policy tightening across all destinations. IEL’s 2H cash flow conversion was strong and the balance sheet position is sound. Earnings guidance assisted in providing market confidence that earnings have likely found a cyclical base. Cost-out of A$25m will be required to hit EBIT guidance of A$115-125m for FY26. Volume pressure still exists; partially offset by price. FY27 sets up to be a potentially meaningful recovery year for IEL if volumes improve, with opex expected to remain relatively flat and direct China IELTs testing expected to have commenced. The UK’s policy settings look like the final hurdle. IEL’s earnings look to have found a base. Increasing confidence into the FY27 earnings recovery will be the key catalyst for a sustained further re-rating.

A cracking year for encoder sales

Ai-Media Technologies
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
AIM’s FY25 result was slightly above our expectations in terms of revenue and underlying EBITDA. Sales momentum as seen with encoder sales in their Tech division was above expectations and bodes well for future growth. We reduce our FY26/27 forecasts on mix changes and higher OPEX while our medium-term forecasts remain largely unchanged. We retain our BUY and 80cps Target Price.

Scale benefits should emerge with book growth

MoneyMe
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
MME’s loan book grew 28% on the prior year as the business returned to a growth focus in the period. Commensurate with the uptick in secured assets (62% of book), NIM compressed to ~8% (vs 10% in the pcp), and MME reported ~A$208m in gross revenue (-3% on pcp). Pleasingly, operating cash profit of A$24m was an improvement on the -A$8m loss in the pcp. We make several changes to our forecasts (details overleaf), largely related to book yield and funding costs. Our price target (A$0.21) and SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation remain unchanged.

Still working through a few kinks

Bapcor
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
BAP delivered a weaker FY25 result, with underlying NPAT down -8.4% to A$80.4m, weaker margins within the typically resilient Trade segment (2H -190bps hoh), and continued underperformance within Retail (2H sales -5.9% on pcp). FY25 was a year of disruption as BAP worked through a large-scale restructuring and simplification program. Positively, some benefits are starting to be realised (~A$27.5m net cost benefit in FY25), which should lead to improved operational performance in the core Specialist Wholesale division in FY26. Despite progress, ongoing underperformance within Retail/NZ (2H sales -5.9%/-4.6%) and weakness within Trade's 4Q (May/June market share losses) continued to significantly detract from earnings (2H NPAT -14%). While BAP is making progress on its turnaround program, the absence of a trading update/FY26 guidance, ongoing Board uncertainty, and expectations for a 2H earnings skew sees us preferring to wait for clearer evidence of an earnings base. HOLD.

Not getting worse, with a recovery pending

PeopleIn
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
FY25 was a challenging year for PPE, with normalised EBITDA down 10% (vs pcp). Whilst several operational metrics look to be stabilising, the result was light on forward guidance, albeit management did note that it remained well-positioned to benefit from a potential Queensland infrastructure boom. The balance sheet continues to improve, with net debt declining to $27.4m and M&A returning to the agenda. The stock trades on an undemanding PER of c.9x, with EPS arguably approaching a trough. To this end, we see earnings growth driving share price appreciation through FY27/28, with any turnaround unlikely to be visible until 4QFY26. Hence we reiterate our Speculative Buy rating with a $1.00/sh price target.

Back on track

SiteMinder
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
SDR’s result was in line with expectations. A strong acceleration in ARR growth in the 2H25, whilst delivering positive underlying FCF, was the key positive takeaway. If SDR can deliver FY26 organic revenue growth in line with FY25 ARR growth of ~27% and a mid-single-digit FCF margin, this would see the stock deliver Rule of 40 of +30% in FY26. If achieved, we think this should drive further upside from here. Upgrade to ACCUMULATE.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more