Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

FY25 Result

Catalyst Metals
3:27pm
September 1, 2025
CYL delivered impressive FY25 financials following a year of operational consistency, value accretive organic growth and portfolio optimisation via M&A. Record gold prices coinciding with a growing production profile enabled CYL to deliver record revenue (+43% pcp), EBITDA (+208%), EBIT (+402%) and NPAT (+15%). Looking ahead to FY26, we assume continued production growth underpinned by Old Highway, Trident and K2 operations. Our growth forecasts remain consistent with CYL’s initial 200kozpa plan. We maintain our previous elevated growth CAPEX assumptions, however, note that FY26 guidance has yet to be formally announced. Following sustained elevated gold prices and a surge past US$3,400/oz we increase our spot valuation scenario to US$3,250/oz (previously US$3,000/oz). We maintain our BUY rating, target price A$8.82ps (previously A$6.75ps). The increase being a function of our revised spot scenario.

Cost-out complete, FUA growth in focus

Income Asset Management Group
3:27pm
August 31, 2025
It was a transitional year for IAM, seeing a substantial cost-out initiative undertaken along with the transition of its administration to Perpetual Corporate Trust. 27% FUA growth to A$2.4bn helped drive a 22% uplift in revenue to A$17.2m for FY25. Our price target of A8.4cps (unchanged) has us retaining our SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation.

A tale of two halves

Camplify Holdings
3:27pm
August 31, 2025
Camplify (CHL) has released its FY25 result. As expected, it was a tougher year overall for the group given both sector-specific impacts and company-specific disruptions which saw GTV and revenue decline ~16% and 12% respectively. However, we note an improved trajectory in the 2H, along with +8% growth in future bookings (~A$23m). We make several changes across our forecast period (details overleaf). Our DCF/Multiples-derived price target remains unchanged at A$1.05. Buy.

Outlook softened but momentum should improve

ReadyTech Holdings
3:27pm
August 31, 2025
RDY’s FY25 result was softer than consensus expectations, however Underlying NPATA of $17.3m was broadly in line with MorgF. FY26/27 guidance was downgraded, and implies a gradual step-up in run-rate as NRR improves (off a challenging FY25) through cloud migration in local government and delivering on its Enterprise wins/pipeline. Whilst we downgrade our EBITDA forecasts by -12.5% in FY26-FY27F reflecting revised guidance, we see the buildup into FY26 as being manageable. Our target price is reduced to $3.00/sh (prev. $3.45/sh), and we retain our BUY rating.

Hoping fish oil prices will improve

Nufarm
3:27pm
August 31, 2025
NUF’s trading update was weaker than consensus expected. Holding over Omega-3 inventory means that net debt is now materially higher than expected and is far too high (ND/EBITDA 3x). Unfortunately, this will likely result in NUF selling the best part of the company (Seed Technologies) to reduce it. NUF said that the strategic review of Seed Technologies is progressing. Given NUF is targeting ND/EBITDA of 2.0x by the end of FY26, this would imply that it is looking to deliver a material improvement in FY26 EBITDA and free cashflow. In our view, NUF is in the too hard basket until we know what this company consists of moving forward and it gets its leverage ratios down to more acceptable levels.

Consistent Delivery

Kina Securities
3:27pm
August 29, 2025
KSL’s 1H25 underlying NPAT (A$57m) was +16% on the pcp, and broadly in-line with MorgansE (A$56m).  This was a clean, solid result in our view. The only slight negative was underlying cost growth remaining high (+10% on the pcp), but this was matched by revenue growth.  We lower our KSL FY25F/FY26F EPS by 1%-5% on slightly higher cost growth than previously forecast. Despite this our valuation rises to A$1.67 (previously A$1.46) with our earnings changes offset by a valuation roll-forward. We also now lift the PE multiple applied in our SOTP’s valuation (7x vs 5.5x previously). With >20% upside existing to our PT (A$1.67), we maintain our BUY recommendation. We lower our KSL FY25F/FY26F EPS by 1%-5% on slightly higher cost growth than previously forecast. Despite this our valuation rises to A$1.67 (previously A$1.46) with our earnings changes offset by a valuation roll-forward. We also now lift the PE multiple applied in our SOTP’s valuation (7x vs 5.5x previously). We believe this is warranted based on the company’s consistent earnings growth over time and its current ROE (17%).

FY25 Earnings: Showing us the revenue ramp-up

NEXTDC
3:27pm
August 29, 2025
NXT’s FY25 result in line with expectations as was FY26, but FY27 was higher. Highlights of the result include: 1) a slide which finally shows investors the revenue ramp-up profile of NXT’s contracted MWs (it’s faster than anticipated so upgrades forecasts); 2) the pipeline is larger than ever (~2 GWs in NSW alone); and 3) setting up a partnership in Japan and Joint Ventures for S4/S7 will lower NXT’s equity requirements (relative to 100% self-funding). While none of these items are totally new, collectively they represent good reasons for the share price to rally strongly. We lift FY26F EBITDA by 2% and FY27 by 23%. We also lift our capex forecasts. The net result is our target price lifts to $19.00 per share from $18.80.

Back to growth

Civmec
3:27pm
August 29, 2025
CVL delivered a robust 2H despite well-flagged lower levels of activity. Costs were well managed, as CVL reported 2H EBITDA margins of 12.6% (vs 10.5% in 1H). The cyclical low point looks to have set in as CVL sees volumes (ex defence) picking up through 2H26, which suggests there are some large contracts that may land before the end of CY25. In shipbuilding, the Landing Craft Heavy program is similarly due to be awarded before CY25. The previously problematic OPV program is progressing well under CVL’s guidance (and ownership from 1/07) and, remarkably, CVL expects to deliver a normal margin through FY26. CVL has already been able to drive efficiencies with undercover construction/modularisation and easy access, which positions it strongly to win future work from the Commonwealth. The stock is trading on 7x FY26 EBIT, with leverage to iron ore replacement works as well as defence spend, and we expect plenty of catalysts to drive a re-rate in the coming months. We upgrade to Buy.

Step change efficiency target for FY27

SmartGroup
3:27pm
August 29, 2025
SIQ’s 1H25 NPATA of A$38.1m (+12% on pcp; flat HOH) was in line with expectations. EBITDA margin of 40% was in line with management’s target. Lease demand was solid, up 10% HOH (settlements +3%; yield -3%). EV’s made up 48% of orders, with volumes continuing post the PHEV policy end. SIQ set an EBITDA margin target of ‘mid-40’s’ percent within FY27, reflecting confidence in operational execution. Investment through FY26 is required. Conditions and business execution look on track for reasonable growth in FY25/26. SIQ is setting up for accelerated growth into FY27/28. In our view, this will be somewhat contingent on the continuation of the EV policy through that period. SIQ’s near-term outlook is solid supported by recent contract wins; management execution on digital (client experience and leads); and the continuation of the EV policy. Medium term, growth from additional services and operating leverage is expected. However, we view the current valuation as fair with earnings supported by a very favourable policy with unknown longevity.

Accretive acquisitions sow seeds of earnings growth

Eureka Group Holdings
3:27pm
August 29, 2025
EGH largely delivered on its revised FY25 guidance, reaffirming its commitment to >19% EPS growth (vs FY24) once the capital raised in Nov-25 is fully deployed – a milestone which should be achieved in CY25. To this end, the EGH investment thesis hasn’t changed, with the business growing earnings through positive like-for-like rental growth, investment across its existing portfolio, and the incremental acquisition (and expansion) of new villages. On this basis we retain our BUY recommendation, slightly increasing our target price to A$0.85/sh (previously $0.79/sh), based on a weighted average of DCF (50%) and PER valuation (50%).

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more