Research notes

Stay informed with the most recent market and company research insights.

A man sitting at a table with a glass of orange juice.

Research Notes

Flexing cost control to navigate a tougher market

Atturra
3:27pm
August 27, 2025
ATA’s FY25 result and FY26 guidance were in line with expectations. FY26 guidance includes a recent acquisition which we now include in our forecasts, otherwise we make no material changes following the FY25 result and update. During FY25 ATA issued a substantial number of shares as it raised capital to fund ongoing acquisitions. Not all of that capital has been put to work in FY25 so the higher share count, temporarily lazy balance sheet and one-off costs resulted in NPAT and EPS declining YoY. We expect, but do not currently forecast, more acquisitions in FY26. History suggests these are likely to be EPS and FCF accretive. After a big year of capital raisings, acquisitions and organic growth in FY25, management noted a “sharpened focus on EPS accretion” from FY26. We lift our EPS forecast by ~3% and target price to A$0.95. Accumulate retained.

Still in need of greater volumes

Matrix Composites & Engineering
3:27pm
August 27, 2025
FY25 was underwhelming. Despite earlier indications that 2H would be broadly in line with 1H, which is not completely untrue at revenue (2H revenue $35m vs 1H $39m), FY25 earnings were well below expectations as a slight miss at revenue compounds harshly through earnings given the significant operating de-leverage. The result again illustrates that MCE needs ~$120m revenue to deliver robust profits. The company has $57m work-in-hand in Subsea to start FY26 (vs $33m at FY25) but, even assuming ~$10m revenue from Corrosion Technologies and Advanced Materials (vs $8m in FY25), MCE still needs to win $33m to reach our previous FY26 forecast of $100m revenue. Management on the call said this was possible but lacked conviction, in our opinion. We therefore take a more conservative view and assume revenue of ~$90m (-10% vs previous forecast). This sees us cut our FY26 EBITDA forecast by 15%. We move to HOLD with a target price of 25c (previously 30c).

Recalibrating for recurrence

Mach7 Technologies
3:27pm
August 27, 2025
Mach7’s FY25 result showed meaningful progress in recurring revenue and operating leverage despite no new major contract wins, with 80% of opex now covered and adjusted EBITDA narrowing to near breakeven. Looking ahead, the strategic review under the new CEO is expected to reshape customer targeting and sales execution, with FY26 likely to be a rebuild year ahead of a more scalable growth phase in FY27. Sales and service overhauls can take time to bear fruit, so we’re happy to rebase our expectations here to levels we view as achievable and beatable. Even post this, our valuation continues to suggest substantial upside from here based only on a modicum of cumulative success. Our target price moderates to A$0.81 yet retain a BUY recommendation. We view current valuation represents strong value for a short-term rebound, medium-term turnaround, and longer-term success.

Model update, lowering our D&A

Telstra Group
3:27pm
August 27, 2025
On TLS’s FY25 conference call management highlighted expectations for materially higher D&A in the coming years. At the time we lifted our FY26/27 D&A by 6-7%. Following a better understanding around the shape of this higher D&A we have reduced our FY26/27 D&A forecasts by 2-3%. Our D&A forecasts now lift ~3% YoY. Lowering our D&A lifts our FY26/27 EPS by ~3.5%. Our Target Price lifts 2% to $4.80 and we retain our HOLD recommendation.

A solid platform for further growth into FY26

Acusensus
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
ACE reported a solid FY25 result which was broadly consistent with full year guidance. Revenue of $59.4m (+20% yoy) was in line with MorgF of $60.3m and Underlying EBITDA (pre-SBP and legal costs) of $5.7m (down 10.8% yoy) was modestly ahead of the top end of FY25 guidance of $4.3m-$5.5m (MorgF $5.0m). FY26 guidance for revenue growth of 33-41% sees our FY26-27F EBITDA forecasts increase by 18%/16%. This sees our blended price target increase to $1.30 (from $1.20) and we maintain our Speculative Buy rating.

FY25 earnings: Don’t Look Back in Anger

Jumbo Interactive
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
Despite cycling the strongest jackpotting period in its history, JIN delivered its second-best ever result, posting group TTV of $996m (FY24: $1,054m). The share price had come under pressure after Managed Services underdelivered and jackpot activity failed to normalise, however the company has since regained ground through higher quality contracts and disciplined cost control. The FY25 result itself marked a clean beat across key metrics. Looking ahead, we see likely guidance conservatism, a refreshed marketing strategy, and potential M&A as catalysts to broaden earnings beyond jackpot dependency. We maintain an ACCUMULATE rating, with our target price lifted to $12.90 (from $11.30). We forecast JIN to deliver DPS of 53c in FY26 (FY25: 54.5c).

Green spend threatens to dilute green returns

Fortescue
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
Healthy FY25 result, although dividend payout now constrained despite strong hematite margins. Iron Bridge contribution still modest and costly, with realisation risk persisting at 84%. Underlying EBITDA beat consensus +2%, while NPAT was -3%. At ~A$19/share, valuation stretched, leaving limited upside without either higher iron ore prices or a pivot in strategy. We downgrade to TRIM.

Dividend and Outlook are ahead of our expectations

SKS Technologies Group
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
SKS recently pre-reported its FY25 headline metrics. Unpacking the group’s broader result today, it was mostly in line with our expectations. However, the key surprises for us were: 1) a much larger than expected 2H25 Dividend of 5.0cps (vs. MorgF 1.5cps), & 2) FY26F revenue guidance for $300m (ahead of prior forecasts). Adjusting for SKS’s more optimistic FY26 guidance sees our PBT forecasts upgraded by +5% in FY26-27F. These changes, along with modest upgrades to our longer-term forecasts sees our Price Target increase to $3.15/sh (prev. 2.75/sh). This sees us now move to an ACCUMULATE rating.

The calm before the storm

Acrow
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
ACF’s FY25 result overall was slightly softer than expectations with EBITDA at the lower end of management’s guidance range of between $80-83m. The result reflected contributions from acquisitions and strong growth from Industrial Access (organic revenue +34%), partly offset by lower Formwork and Commercial Scaffold revenue. Management expects Industrial Access to continue to grow with revenue approaching $200m in FY26 compared to $132m in FY25. Trading conditions in the Formwork market, however, are expected to remain soft in 1H26. We adjust FY26-28F EBITDA by between -7% and +7%. We maintain our BUY rating on ACF with a target price of $1.32. While the near-term outlook for Formwork remains subdued due to uncertainty around the commencement of key projects, the longer-term outlook is strong - particularly in the lead-up to the Brisbane Olympics. Prospects for Industrial Access are also positive, with opportunities to expand geographically (eg, into WA and SA) and across sectors such as Defence and asset maintenance. Trading on 9.2x FY26F PE with a 5.7% yield, we continue to view ACF as an attractive investment.

Through the worst of it

Helloworld
3:27pm
August 26, 2025
While HLO’s FY25 result was well down on the pcp, after a stronger than expected 2H25, it beat expectations. HLO’s outlook comments were relatively upbeat and it highlighted its strong forward bookings. New acquisitions should also underpin solid earnings growth in FY26. We have upgraded our forecasts. Given HLO’s undemanding trading multiples, improved trading conditions, and contribution from new acquisitions, we upgrade to a BUY rating. In FY26, it will be interesting to watch HLO’s next move regarding its ~17% stake in WJL.

News & insights

Michael Knox discusses how weakening US labour market conditions have prompted the Fed to begin easing, with expectations for further cuts to a neutral rate that could stimulate Indo-Pacific trade.


In our previous discussion on the Fed, we suggested that the deterioration in the US labour market would move the Fed toward an easing path. We have now seen the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points at the September meeting. As a result, the effective Fed funds rate has fallen from 4.35% to 4.10%.

Our model of the Fed funds rate suggests that the effective rate should move toward 3.35%. At this level, the model indicates that monetary policy would be neutral.

The Summary of Economic Projections from Federal Reserve members and Fed Presidents also suggests that the Fed funds rate will fall to a similar level of 3.4% in 2026.

We believe this will happen by the end of the first quarter of 2026. In fact, the Summary of Economic Projections expects an effective rate of 3.6% by the end of 2025.

The challenge remains the gradually weakening US labour market, with unemployment expected to rise from 4.3% now to 4.5% by the end of 2025. This is then projected to fall very slowly to 4.4% by the end of 2026 and 4.3% by the end of 2027.

These expectations would suggest one of the least eventful economic cycles in recent history. We should be so lucky!

In the short term, it is likely that the Fed will cut the effective funds rate to 3.4% by March 2026.

This move to a neutral stance will have a significant effect on the world trade cycle and on commodities. The US dollar remains the principal currency for financing trade in the Indo-Pacific. Lower US short-term rates will likely generate a recovery in the trade of manufacturing exports in the Indo-Pacific region, which in turn will increase demand for commodities.

The Fed’s move to a neutral monetary policy will generate benefits well beyond the US.

Read more
Michael Knox discusses the RBA’s decision to hold rates in September and outlines the conditions under which a November rate cut could occur, based on trimmed mean inflation data.

Just as an introduction to what I'm going to talk about in terms of Australian interest rates today, we'll talk a little bit about the trimmed mean, which is what the RBA targets. The trimmed mean was invented by the Dallas Fed and the Cleveland Fed. What it does is knock out the 8% of crazy high numbers and the 8% of crazy low numbers.

That's the trimming at both ends. So the number you get as a result of the trimmed mean is pretty much the right way of doing it. It gets you to where the prices of most things are and where inflation is. That’s important to understand what's been happening in inflation.

With that, we've seen data published for the month of July and published in the month of August, which we'll talk about in a moment. Back in our remarks on the 14th of August, we said that the RBA would not cut in September. That was at a time when the market thought there would be a September return. But we thought they would wait until November. So with the RBA leaving the cash rate unchanged on the 30th of September, is it still possible for a cut in November?

The RBA released its statement on 30th September, and that noted that recent data, while partial and volatile, suggests that inflation in the September quarter may be higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy. So what are they talking about? What are they thinking about when they say that? Well, it could be that they’re thinking about the very sharp increases in electricity prices in the July and August monthly CPIs.

In the August monthly CPI, even with electricity prices rising by a stunning 24.6% for the year to August faster than the 13.6% for the year to July; the trimmed mean still fell from 2.7% in the year to July to 2.6% in the year to August. Now, a similar decline in September would take that annual inflation down to 2.4%.

The September quarter CPI will be released on the 29th of October. Should it show a trimmed mean of 2.5% or lower, then we think that the RBA should provide a rate cut in November. This would provide cheer for homeowners as we move towards the festive season. Still, it all depends on what we learn from the quarterly CPI on the 29th of October.

Read more
In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

In recent days, several people have asked for my updated view on the Federal Reserve and the Fed funds rate, as well as the outlook for the Australian cash rate. I thought I’d walk through our model for the Fed funds rate and explain our approach to the RBA’s cash rate.

It’s fascinating to look at the history of the current tightening cycle. The Fed began from a much higher base than the RBA, and in this cycle, they reached a peak rate of 535 basis points, compared to the RBA’s peak of 435 basis points. For context, in the previous tightening cycle, the RBA reached a peak of 485 basis points.

The reason the RBA was more cautious this time around is largely due to an agreement between Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the RBA. The goal was to implement rate increases that would not undo the employment gains made in the previous cycle. As a result, the RBA was far less aggressive in its approach to rate hikes.

This divergence in peak rates is important. Because the Australian cash rate peaked lower, the total room for rate cuts and the resulting stimulus to the economy is significantly smaller than in previous cycles.

The Fed, on the other hand, peaked at 535 basis points in August last year and began cutting rates shortly after. By the end of December, they had reduced the rate to 435 basis points, where it has remained since.

Recent U.S. labour market data shows a clear slowdown. Over the past 20 years, average annual employment growth in the U.S. has been around 1.6 percent, but this fell to 1.0 percent a few months ago and dropped further to 0.9 percent in the most recent data.

This suggests that while the Fed has successfully engineered a soft landing by slowing the economy, it now risks tipping into a hard landing if rates remain unchanged.

Fed Funds Rate Model Update

Our model for the Fed funds rate is based on three key variables: inflation, unemployment, and inflation expectations. While inflation has remained relatively stable, inflation expectations have declined significantly, alongside the drop in employment growth.

As a result, our updated model now estimates the Fed funds rate should be around 338 basis points, which is 92 basis points lower than the current rate of 435. This strongly suggests we are likely to see a 25 basis point cut at the Fed’s September 17 meeting.

There are two more Fed meetings scheduled for the remainder of the year, one in October and another on December 10. However, we will need to review the minutes from the September meeting before forming a view on whether further cuts are likely.

Australian Cash Rate Outlook

Turning to the Australian cash rate, as mentioned, the peak this cycle was lower than in the past, meaning the stimulatory effect of rate cuts is more limited.

We have already seen three rate cuts, and the key question now is whether there will be another at the RBA’s 4 November meeting.

This decision hinges entirely on the September quarter inflation data, which will be released on 29 October 2025.

The RBA’s strategy is guided by the concept of the real interest rate. Over the past 20 years, the average real rate has been around 0.85 percent. Assuming the RBA reaches its 2.5 percent inflation target, this implies a terminal cash rate of around 335 basis points. Once that level is reached, we expect it will mark the final rate cut of this cycle, unless inflation falls significantly further.

So, will we see a rate cut in November?

It all depends on the trimmed mean inflation figure for the September quarter. If it comes in at 2.5 percent or lower, we expect a rate cut. The June quarter trimmed mean was 2.7 percent, and the monthly July figure was 2.8 percent. If the September figure remains the same or rises, there will be no cut. Only a drop to 2.5 percent or below will trigger another move.

We will have a much clearer picture just a few days before Melbourne Cup Day.

Read more