This article is a converted version of Michael Knox’s full presentation, which can be viewed in the video above.
How Kevin Warsh Plans to Cut Rates and Lower the US Dollar Without Sparking Inflation
Key Points
• Kevin Warsh has been nominated as the next Chair of the US Federal Reserve with a mandate to lower interest rates and weaken the US dollar.
• Warsh’s experience during the Global Financial Crisis informs his views on monetary policy and the risks of relying too heavily on quantitative easing.
• He argues that quantitative easing has become a moral hazard and believes the Federal Reserve must reduce its balance sheet.
• Quantitative tightening could offset the inflationary effects of a lower fed funds rate.
• Warsh’s approach aims to maintain inflation control while delivering a more competitive US dollar.
Introduction
Michael Knox examines the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Chair of the US Federal Reserve and outlines how Warsh may be able to lower interest rates and weaken the US dollar without causing inflation. Warsh’s background, experience during the Global Financial Crisis, and his views on quantitative easing provide a useful insight into what his policy approach may look like.
Kevin Warsh’s Background and Early Career
Kevin Warsh was born in Albany, New York, the capital of New York State. He completed a degree in public policy at Stanford University in 1992 and later earned a master's degree in economics and regulatory policy from Harvard Law School in 1995. He also undertook further study at Harvard Business School and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Warsh began his career at Morgan Stanley in 1995, rising to become an executive director in mergers and acquisitions by 2002. That year he shifted to public service, joining the Bush White House as executive secretary to the National Economic Council, where he was responsible for helping to brief cabinet members on economic developments.
Warsh’s Time at the Federal Reserve
In 2006, at the age of 35, Warsh became the youngest person ever appointed as a Governor of the Federal Reserve. He joined the institution just before the onset of the Global Financial Crisis and quickly became known for his ability to explain complex financial developments in clear and accessible language.
Ben Bernanke, who was Chair at the time, noted that Warsh’s experience with major Wall Street firms helped the Federal Reserve understand how financial institutions were responding to the crisis. One of Warsh’s most memorable speeches came in April 2008, when he warned that markets had become overly dependent on abundant liquidity. He famously compared the behaviour of market participants to fish that do not realise they are wet until the water is gone.
Warsh left the Federal Reserve in March 2011 and re-entered the private sector. He joined the board of UPS, worked with Stanley Druckenmiller’s family office, and became a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he lectured at Stanford’s business school.
How Quantitative Easing Shaped Warsh’s Thinking
When Warsh joined the Federal Reserve in 2006, the Fed’s balance sheet stood at around 850 billion US dollars. By the time he left in 2011, it had grown to roughly 2.87 trillion US dollars. This expansion occurred through a policy known as quantitative easing, which was introduced as an emergency response to the financial crisis.
Quantitative easing involved the Federal Reserve purchasing Treasury debt from banks. This freed space on bank balance sheets for them to buy corporate debt, which helped restore private sector investment during the crisis. The policy played an important role in preventing a deeper recession.
However, Warsh has since argued that quantitative easing was intended only for extreme circumstances but it has been used too frequently in subsequent downturns. He suggests this has created a moral hazard because legislators may feel comfortable increasing spending knowing the Federal Reserve will purchase the resulting debt.
Why Warsh Believes Quantitative Tightening Is Necessary
Following the crisis, the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet continued to grow, eventually reaching a peak of nearly 9 trillion US dollars by 2022. By early 2026 it had fallen to about 6.6 trillion US dollars, but Warsh believes far greater reduction is required.
He argues that the balance sheet should be gradually reduced until it returns to a similar share of GDP as when he first joined the Federal Reserve in 2006. This would suggest a long period of quantitative tightening.
Knox explains that Warsh sees quantitative tightening as necessary to counteract the inflationary risks that could accompany lowering the fed funds rate. In effect, tightening the balance sheet removes excess liquidity, making it possible to reduce interest rates while still keeping inflation under control. A lower fed funds rate would in turn, put downward pressure on the US dollar.
What Warsh’s Policy Approach Means
Warsh intends to return The Federal Reserve to its position in the US Economy prior to the financial crisis. He wants to return to the lower profile Federal Reserve that existed during the period of Alan Greenspan.
His strategy is to continue quantitative tightening for an extended period to offset the effects of lowering interest rates. This reduces the risk that easier policy will lead to rising inflation. It also restores discipline by reducing the US Congress’s reliance on large scale asset purchases.
Michael Knox notes that Warsh’s thinking is grounded in his experience during the Global Financial Crisis. Warsh believes that the Federal Reserve should not support government spending through asset purchases. His approach should produce a weaker US dollar but not higher inflation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does Kevin Warsh want to reduce the Federal Reserve balance sheet?
He believes quantitative easing has become a moral hazard and that the balance sheet must shrink to restore fiscal and monetary discipline.
How can lower interest rates avoid causing inflation?
Warsh argues that quantitative tightening removes excess liquidity, which counteracts the inflationary pressures associated with rate cuts.
Why would a weaker US dollar be desirable?
A lower dollar boosts US export competitiveness and can support domestic manufacturing.
What role did Warsh play during the Global Financial Crisis?
Ben Bernanke, who was Chairman at the time, said Warsh's familiarity with major firms on Wall Street was invaluable in helping deal with the Global Financial Crisis.
Is quantitative easing still being used today?
While the balance sheet is now shrinking, Warsh believes the policy has been overused in past downturns.
Conclusion
According to Michael Knox, Kevin Warsh’s policy approach reflects a disciplined and historically informed understanding of monetary policy. Warsh’s intention to lower interest rates while shrinking the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet aims to achieve a weaker US dollar without triggering inflation.
Want to discuss how this impacts your portfolio?
DISCLAIMER: Information is of a general nature only. Before making any financial decisions, you should consult with an experienced professional to obtain advice specific to your circumstances.
